The Deficit of Democracy in Europe 4003-213DDUE
The idea and purpose of this lecture is, firstly, to familiarize students with the moral and political dimension of democracy, in that context, to pose the problem of democratic deficit, thirdly to illustrate this issue on the example of the EU, and fourthly, to show the impact of the broader context of global changes on the state of democracy.
The purpose of this course is to acquaint students with sources, various assessments and dynamics of the phenomenon of democratic deficit, with emphasizing the nature of this phenomenon in the EU.
Seminar will consist of three thematic blocks:
1. The first part will concern the problem of descriptive and normative definitions of democracy, the main principles of democracy: equality, freedom, sovereignty, representation, strict liability, protection of civil rights, justice, etc.. In particular, the paradoxes and difficulties that are related to the implementation of these democratic values should be highlighted.
2. The second block will concern the political and legal changes (including: the triumph of liberal democracy; postcolonial transformations, dissemination of international organizations, European integration, human rights, etc), cultural and social changes (including: the collapse of 'grand narratives' , individualism, the recognition, multiculturalism, identity, and the dissemination of social rights), as well as economic changes that have affected the evolution of democracy after World War II.
3. The third block deals with general and specific arguments for the so-called democratic deficit in the EU. Their presentation involves its evaluation, as well as an attempt to lighten the broader context of the debate on democratic deficit, in particular the tensions between democracy and liberalism.
Type of course
Learning outcomes
The lecture should familiarize students with the phenomenon of democratic deficit, including the complex issue of understanding democracy, the general arguments in the debate on the democratic deficit, as well as the specific allegations about the democratic deficit formulated in context of EU institutions.
Assessment criteria
Students are assessed on the basis of their attendance, aa well as, on a final critical review of one of the selected readings. Students should: 1 /. Fairly present the selected text, 2 /. Clearly articulate the thesis, put the problem and point out the controversial issues of 3 /. refer critically to the text and the hypotheses included in it. The text should be sent to the e-mail box of the lecture leading professor.
Bibliography
1. Mouffe, Chantal. Paradoks demokracji, [ tłum. W. Jach, M. Kamińska, A. Orzechowski] Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej Edukacji TWP we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 2005.
2. Rancière, Jacques. Nienawiść do Demokracji [tłum. M. Kropiwnicki], Książka i Prasa , Warszawa 2008.
3. Tinder, Glenn. Myślenie Polityczne, {tłum. A. Dziurdzik], PWN 2003.
4. Kubin, Tomasz. „Zagadnienie ‘deficytu demokracji’ w UE”, Cz. I – aspekty teoretyczne, w: Studia Europejskie 1/2007, oraz Cz. II – Aspekty praktyczne …, w: tamże, 2/2007.
5. Moravcsik, Andrew. „Deficyt demokracji – wyolbrzymiony problem” w: Nowa Europa I(I)/2005.
6. Anioł, Włodzimierz. „Deficyt demokratyczny w systemie globalnym” w: Studia Europejskie 4/2002.
7. Klaus, Katarzyna. „Pojęcie i źródła deficytu demokracji w UE” , w: Studia Europejskie 2/2004.
8. Riedel, Rafał. „Deficyt Demokratyczny w UE. Defekt czy Błogosławieństwo?” w: Studia Europejskie 4/2008
9. Plattner, Marc, F. Suwerenność i demokracja” w: Nowa Europa I(5)/2007