Selected issues from 19th century Ukrainian literature 3222-30WZL4K-N
Characteristics of social and political events and processes of the 19th century. Enfranchisement reform in 1861. Publications of 1863 and 1876 directed against Ukrainian literature and language.
- In search of language, style and genre. The works by Ivan Kotliarewski
- Poetry of the era of romanticism and realism
- The works by Taras Shevchenko
- The specificity of the development of Ukrainian realistic prose from the ethnographic-romantic trend to naturalism. The works by Ivan Nechuy-Levytsky
- Development of narrative prose. Works by Panas Myrny
- Development of drama and activity of the "The Theatre of Coryphaei"
- New trends and literary genres of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Works of Ivan Franko
- The clash of realist trend of “narodnytstvo” with modernist trends at the turn of the century. The first signs of a breakthrough in the artistic consciousness.
Expressionist stories by Vasyl Stefanyk.
- The beginning of a new century - the emergence of modernist manifestos. M. Vorony's first open letter from 1901 calling for the "Europeanization" of poetry and the search for new creative paths. The literary activity of "Young Muse"
- Works by Mykhailo Kotsiubynsky
- Works by Olha Kobylianska
- Works by Lesya Ukrainka
The student's workload:
30 hours in the classroom - 1 ECTS
30 hours of preparation for classes - 1 ECTS
30 hours of exam preparation - 1 ECTS
Total 90 hours - 3 ECTS
Type of course
Mode
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
After completing the course, the student:
- knows and understands at an advanced level the history and contexts of Ukrainian literature in the nineteenth century K1_W07
- is able to search, critically analyze and evaluate, select and use information on Ukrainian literature of the 19th century. K1_U03
- is able to formulate and solve a research task in the field of Ukrainian literary studies K1_U06
- is able to plan and organize work individually and in a team K1_U12
- is ready to critically evaluate his knowledge and received content K1_K01
Assessment criteria
The condition for passing the course and admission to the exam is:
• systematic preparation for the classes of the given material
• conducting and a written presentation of an individual research project
Semester work requirements:
1. The author should formulate a research problem, that is, make a thesis which he will try to verify (prove or disprove) in the work.
2. Before starting to write a thesis, its plan and the list of literature should be consulted with the teacher.
3. The paper should be 5-8 pages of standard text, ie the length should not be less than 10,000 characters with spaces and greater than 15,000 characters with spaces (including footnotes). The work should contain a list of the used bibliography (the volume of the list of the used bibliography does not, however, be included in the above-mentioned volume of the essay).
4. The structure of the work should include: introduction, development, ending, bibliography. The introduction should contain: thesis (formulation of the research problem), objectives of the work, justification for the choice of topic, description of the subject and subject literature. Develop a proper analysis of the texts. The conclusion should include the conclusions resulting from the research.
5. Each page of the work must be provided with bibliographic, source or reference footnotes.
6. The text of the work should be edited in accordance with the following rules: - font: Times New Roman Normal, size 12, - foreign language phrases in italics, - line spacing: 1.5 lines, - standard margins (top, bottom, left and right: 2.5 cm), - title of the article: Times New Roman Normal font, size 14, bold.
7. Footnotes should be placed in the text as footnotes, font Times New Roman Normal, size 10, line spacing: 1 line. A footnote is treated like a sentence, so it should start with a capital letter and end with a period. In the text, the number of the footnote should be placed without spaces after the word, before the comma. At the end of the sentence, the footnote number is placed before the full stop at the end of the sentence. Notation of footnotes and bibliographies according to SUV standard.
The subject ends with a written exam according to the following criteria, presented in the form of percentage thresholds
60% - 68% - 3 (satisfactory)
69% - 77% - 3+ (satisfactory plus)
78% - 86% - 4 (good)
87% - 93% - 4+ (good plus)
94% - 97% - 5 (very good)
98% -100% - 5! (very good grade with an exclamation mark)
Assessment criteria:
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all the essential ones
aspects - 5.0 (very good)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all the essential ones
aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some (less
important) aspects - 4.0 (good)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some of the essential ones
aspects and with significant inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes disregarding important aspects
or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory plus)
- failure to achieve the assumed learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
The condition for admission to the exam is also attendance. The student has the right to 2 unexcused absences, each subsequent one requires a justification. The lecturer decides about the acknowledgment of the absence.
The form of crediting the classes in which the student was absent is determined by the lecturer.
Exceeding excused and unjustified absences for 50% of classes may be the basis for failing the course.
The conditions for the re-sit exam are the same as for the credit test for the main term.
Bibliography
Wybrane utwory: Marko Wowczok, Iwana Neczuja-Lewyckiego, Panasa Myrnego, Iwana Franki, Łesi Ukrainki, Olhy Kobylańskiej
Istorija ukrainśkoji literatury XIX st. u 3 kn. Za red. M. T. Jacenka, Kyiv 1993-95.
M. Wozniak, Istorija ukrainśkoji literatury w 2 kn, Lviv 1992-94.
S. Jefremow, Istorija ukrainśkoho pysmenstwa, Kyiv 1995.
A. Kornijenko, Ukraiński modernizm, Kraków 1998.
S. Pawłyczko, Dyskurs modernizmu w ukraińskij literaturi, Kyiv 1999.
F. Nieuważny, O poezji ukraińskiej od Iwana Kotlarewskiego do Liny Kostenko, Białystok 1993.
I. Denysiuk, Rozwytok maloji prozy XIX – poczatku XX st., Kyiv 1981.
G. Grabowycz, Narysy do istorii ukraińskoji literatury, Kyiv 1998.
G. Grabowycz, Do istorii ukrainśkoji literatury. Doslidżennia, ese poleminka, Kyiv 1997.
M. Najenko, Ukrajinśkie literaturoznastwo, Kyiv 1997.
Literaturoznawczyj słownyk-dovidnyk, Kyiv 1997.
M. Kuplowski, Iwan Franko jako krytyk literatury polskiej, Rzeszów 1974.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: