Doing resarch with AI tools 3500-FAKANG-DRWA-SCC
The development of AI tools such as Chatgpt has had a huge impact on how we search for information and process it, also for the purpose of creating and editing texts. Since more and more AI-based research and writing tools are being developed, new problems and concerns arise: how to actually use them to benefit the writing and research processes? How to do so ethically, i.e., in ways which support the individual creativity instead of replacing it with generated answers?
The goal of the course is to develop and improve academic writing skills and learn how to effectively and ethically apply generative AI tools in the writing and analysis process. Among other things, course participants will learn how to write an abstract for a conference speech, how to communicate research results in a presentation, how to conduct a literature review and write a thesis. Participants will also learn how to use tools such as Elicit, Wordtune, Notebook LM and Claude, among others, to support the writing and analysis process. The course is designed as a seminar with a workshop component, allowing students to practice and implement newly acquired skills.
To pass the course, the students will take part in group discussions and assignments, as well as submit take-home assignments related to the tasks discussed in class.
Koordynatorzy przedmiotu
Rodzaj przedmiotu
Tryb prowadzenia
Założenia (opisowo)
Efekty kształcenia
W_01 – The student understands the principles of ethical and critical use of AI tools in the process of academic writing.
U_01 – The student is able to prepare an abstract, essay, or presentation with the support of AI tools.
U_02 – The student is able to conduct a literature review and synthesize findings in an academic paper.
U_03 – The student is able to integrate their own argumentation with data and texts generated by AI, while maintaining transparency of sources.
K_01 – The student collaborates in academic discussions while respecting the principles of ethics and intellectual property.
Kryteria oceniania
Activity in class (50% of final grade): discussion, participation in group activities and individual in-class activities
Submission of take-home assignments (50% of final grade): assignments related to topics discussed in class must be submitted on time and complete
Allowed number of absences: 2
Literatura
Bailey, S. (2017). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International
Students (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169996