Freedom of Speech in the U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence 2200-1CV09-ERA

Classes held once a week for 90 minutes are skills oriented. Therefore presence (three absences allowed only) and active participation in class discussion are essential to complete the course successfully, although a written exam, i.e. a short essay, will be necessary to get a final grade.

The course is designed as an introduction to common law. The very first freedoms of the First Amendment to the US Constitutions give only an occasion to discuss the jurisprudence and methods of the US Supreme Court.

1. Right to shocking speech? (Texas v. Johnson, 1989, and Snyder v. Phelps, 2011)
2. The history of free expression under common law. Clear and present danger? (Schenck v. US, 1919, and Abrams v. US, 1919).
3. The ‘Red Scare’ as witch-hunt? (after World War I: Gitlow v. New York, 1925, and Whitney v. California, 1927; after World War II: Dennis v. US, 1951)
4. Freedom of incitement or sedition. (Brandenburg v. Ohio, 1969, and United States v. Williams, 2008)
5. Expression that provokes a hostile audience reaction. (Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942, and Feiner v. New York, 1951)
6. Nazis in a Jewish town – the Skokie controversy.
7. The funeral of hate speech? (R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minn., 1992)
8. Dangerous disclosures and the national security – the Pentagon Papers. (New York Times Co. v. US; US v. Washington Post Co., 1971)
9. Right to lie under free speech? (United States v. Alvarez, 2012)
10. Buffer zones against free speech? (Hill v. Colorado, 2000, and Mc Cullen v. Coakley, 2014)
11. Speech restrictions that “does not pass strict scrutiny, or intermediate scrutiny, or even the laugh test”. (Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, 2015; cf. Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, 2020)
12. Internet as a new forum of speech. (Reno v. ACLU, 1997, and Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2002)
13. Threats on Facebook as protected free speech? (Elonis v. United States, 2015)
14. Car plates as a new forum for speech. (Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 2009, and Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, 2015)
15. Patent and Trademark law: fighting with immoral and scandalous matters or bad words? (Matal v. Tam, 2017, Iancu v. Brunetti, 2019)