Practical French for academic communication 4100-IVMNJFKA

S_W01
The student possesses an in-depth understanding of selected facts, theories, processes, and phenomena within the fields of linguistics and foreign language didactics, with a focus on practical applications in teaching foreign languages at the third stage of education, adult education, and higher education didactics.

S_W02
The student possesses a comprehensive knowledge of the essential terminology in linguistics, pedagogy, and psychology relevant to teaching foreign languages at all educational levels.

S_W17
The student has a substantial understanding of interpersonal and social communication processes in the French language, including their regularities and disruptions.

S_U01
The student is able to search, analyse, evaluate, select and use information, using a variety of sources and methods, including advanced information and
communication techniques, in French

S_U03
The student is able to conduct a critical analysis of the quality of foreign language teaching

S_U07
The student is able to assess the suitability of a variety of methods, procedures and best
practices, and select and apply the appropriate approach with the goal
of accomplishing tasks and solving problems related to foreign
language teaching

S_U12
The student is able to formulate and test hypotheses to conduct a critical analysis of their own
actions and identify possible areas for change in the future

K_U18
The student is able to communicate in French and in a foreign language, conduct a debate using a variety of channels and techniques, with all participants in the teaching-learning process and experts in those academic disciplines that are relevant to the field of studies - foreign language teaching,

S_U19
The student is able to prepare written work in French relevant to their field of studies, at an advanced level, onspecific issues, using advanced theoretical approaches and a variety of sources

S_U20
The student is able to prepare, and deliver in public, oral presentations in French for specific purposes, using advancedtheoretical approaches, as well as a variety of sources

S_U21
The student is able to speak and write consistently and precisely in French on topics related to educationalmatters, applying different theoretical approaches and using findings from other disciplines related to the field of studies

S_U22
The student is able to present their ideas, concerns, suggestions and arguments in French supporting them with chosen theoretical perspectives and diverse viewpoints

S_U23
The student is able to use language skills at CEFR level C1+ in French including the specificity of academic language and that ofclassroom communication,

S_U25
The student is able to perform the various roles required for working as a team, is willing to accept and assign tasks, and possesses the organisational skills necessary in designing and implementing professional educational
activities; can act as a team leader

S_K01
The graduate is prepared to pursue lifelong learning

S_K02
The graduate is prepared to critically reflect on the level of their skills and knowledge, constantly develop professionally and personally, self-assess their competences, improve their skills, plan their development and training, consult experts in case of difficulties

S_K06
The graduate is prepared to interact and work in a group, performing various roles

S_K07
The graduate is prepared to correctly identify the priorities for the implementation of specified tasks

1. Course Completion Requirements
The conditions for being admitted to pass the course are:
– attendance in class (2 absences are allowed; unexcused absences exceeding the limit result in a “NK” grade and the necessity to retake the course),
– timely completion of all mandatory written and/or oral assignments carried out during the classes.
The final grade is determined based on the assessment methods and criteria described in Section 2, according to the assigned weights.
Use of AI tools and technologies supporting language processing is permitted only with the instructor’s consent and after agreeing on the scope of their use. Using AI tools without the instructor’s consent is treated as a violation of academic integrity and results in a failing grade.
2. Assessment Methods
1. Multimedia Presentation on a Selected Topic
– Description: Preparation of a topic within the scope of the curriculum in the form of a multimedia presentation. Presentation of the topic in class using the prepared slides. Leading a discussion on the presented topic as well as exercises and other related activities.
– Weight in the final grade: 50%
– Assessed learning outcomes: S_W01, S_W02, S_U01, 03, 07, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, S_K06
2. Final Language Test
– Description: A language test covering lexical and grammatical issues taught during the course. Particular emphasis is placed on mastering grammatical competence at the C1 level.
– Weight: 50%
– Assessed learning outcomes: SW_17, S_U23, S_K01, S_K02
3. Assessment Criteria
Multimedia Presentation
The PowerPoint presentation will be assessed across four categories:
I. Presentation Organization
II. Content of the Presentation
III. Communication and Language
IV. Use of PowerPoint
Ad. I.
Clarity of introduction and effective presentation of the topic.
Presentation of the outline of the talk.
Coherence and logical progression of the structure.
Relevance and soundness of conclusions.
Ability to initiate constructive discussion.
Ad. II.
Good knowledge of the topic; appropriate selection of issues discussed.
Quality and reliability of academic content.
Appropriate use of topic-related scientific terminology.
Credibility and relevance of bibliography and information sources.
Ad. III.
Overall demeanor.
Voice quality: audibility, clarity, modulation.
Dynamism of the presentation / fluency of speech.
Language level / linguistic accuracy.
Ad. IV.
Readability of slides: titles, sections, logical order, clarity.
Visual quality of slides (layout, choice of images, colours, fonts, etc.).
Smoothness of transitions between slides.
Natural use of presentation notes (without excessive reliance).

All criteria are applied jointly. Each criterion accounts for 25% of the final presentation grade. All criteria must be satisfied to a satisfactory level in order to receive a passing grade.
2. Written Language Test
The C1-level grammar competence test covers grammatical topics such as:
– verbs, conjugation, and the use of moods and tenses,
– interrogative and negative sentences; conditional clauses; relative clauses,
– reported and direct speech,
– the use of determiners and personal pronouns,
– nominalisation.

4. Test Grading Scale
Pass threshold: 60%
Grade ranges:
– 90–100% – 5.0
– 85–89% – 4.5
– 75–84% – 4.0
– 70–74% – 3.5
– 60–69% – 3.0
– 0–59% – 2.0

BARIL, D. (2008). Techniques de l'expression écrite et orale. Paris: Sirey.
CALVET, J-L. (dir). (2014). Histoire de l'écriture. / J.-L.Calvet. Paris : A. Fayard
CONSTANTINESCU-ŞTEFĂNEL R., 2006 - Les méthodologies non-conventionnelles, https://www.dialogos.rei.ase.ro/14/17_Constantinescu-Ruxandra_Les-methodolo.pdf
CUQ J.P.; GRUCA J., 2003 – Cours de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble. .
DUFEU B., 1996 - Les approches non-conventionnelles des langues étrangères, Hachette, Paris.
GARNIERr S., Savage A.D. (2018). Rédiger un texte académique en français.
Paris: Editions Ophrys.
GUVOTt-CLEMENT, C. (2012). Apprendre la langue de l'argumentation. Paris: Belin Sup Langues.
LUNDQUIST, L. (2013). Lire un texte académique en français. Paris: Editions Ophrys.
MORTUREUX, M-F. (2015). La lexicologie entre langue et discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
RIEGEL, M., PELLAT, J-C., RIOULl, R. (2018). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
ROBERT J.-P., ROSEN E., 2010 - Dictionnaire pratique du CECR, Ed. Ophrys, Paris.

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of 4100-IVMNJFKA in USOSweb