Ethical and legal aspects of animal protection 3700-WYK9-AZ
The lectures will begin with the history of ethical (philosophical) views on human obligations towards animals. This history will lead to the emergence of two still relevant ethical theories, namely (1) deontology and (2) utilitarianism. (1) Starting from historical concepts of natural laws and today’s doctrine of human rights, the course will present the intellectual origins of the present concept of (moral) animal rights authored by Tom Regan. The premises of Regan’s theory will be analysed together with their consequences and the applicability of the concept of inherent rights to the diversity of non-human beings. (2) Next, we will go back to the advent of utilitarianism in the 18th century, moving on to Peter Singer’s ethics of equal consideration of interests and the views of other utilitarianists. This will inevitably lead to the axiological foundations of ethics, especially assessing the value of an individual being’s life. Concluding this segment, the course will present the prospects for a synthesis of deontology and utilitarianism, and also (briefly) the attitude of various universalizing ethics towards “environmental ethics” (60 hours will be devoted to “environmental philosophy” itself in the fourth semester).
In the second part, after a brief historical introduction (animal trials), the course will show the possibilities of giving animal subjects legal personality based on current knowledge justifying the attribution of individual interests to them. Against this background, we will present the current legal status of animals usually treated as objects (things) and the few attempts at their de-reification. In particular, the course will present needs and possibilities to introduce rights for animal subjects into fundamental laws (constitutions), with a review of constitutional provisions already introduced in a few Western countries.
1. Basic concepts from ethics and moral philosophy. The relation of ethics to law.
2. Ethical (philosophical) views on human obligations towards animals in antiquity and the Middle Ages.
3. The concept of natural laws and the human rights doctrine as the source of the concept of (moral) animal rights.
4. Tom Regan’s animal rights theory, its premises and consequences, and the applicability of the concept of inherent rights to the diversity of non-human beings.
5. Criticism and present state of the animal rights doctrine.
6. Definition of utilitarianism, its beginnings and main trends.
7. Peter Singer’s ethics of equal consideration of interests and the views of other contemporary utilitarianists.
8. Axiological foundations of utilitarianism, especially assessing the value of an individual being’s life.
9. The need and prospects for a synthesis of deontology and utilitarianism, and also (briefly),
10. the attitude of various universalizing ethics to environmental ethics and Christian ethics.
Part two
11. The legal status of animals in the past (animal trials).
12. The current legal status of animals (international comparisons).
13. The theory of legal personality and the possibility of granting it to animal subjects based on current knowledge justifying the attribution of individual interests to them.
14. Needs and possibilities to introduce animal subjects’ rights into fundamental laws (constitutions).
15. The prospects for granting animal subjects the status of citizens (based on Donaldson & Kymlicka 2011 – Zoopolis)
Type of course
Learning outcomes
Students will:
KW_03 Know the rudiments of environmental philosophy, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science and bioethics
KW_05 Understand the role of law, customs and morality as regulators of relations between humans and animals
KW_07 Be familiar with ethical and cultural attitudes towards animals in the history of civilization, with a special focus on changes occurring in contemporary times
KW_08 Understand the natural, economic, legal, social and political determinants of relations between humans and animals
KW_09 Be aware of the effects of decisions, especially those that interfere with the natural environment and the wellbeing of animals
KU_01 Be able to analyse the main phenomena of human-animal relations from the perspective of different disciplines
KU_02 Diagnose the main ideological disputes surrounding the status of animals and their utilization by humans throughout history
KK_01 Follow, critically analyse and shape attitudes towards animals
KK_02 Be able to offer fact-based arguments in academic debates and ideological disputes while respecting views different from their own
KK_03 Be able to correctly interpret and propagate human responsibility towards animals and the environment they live in
KK_07 Be sensitive to the fate of animals and the connection between humans and nature
Assessment criteria
An exam involving two short essays on set topics.
Bibliography
Wykład jest autorski, nie ma książek pokrywających się z jego przekazem. Literatura uzupełniająca:
Smaga, Ł. 2010. Ochrona Humanitarna Zwierząt. EkoPress, Białystok.
Status etyczny
DeGrazia D. 2002/2014. Prawa zwierząt /Bardzo krótkie wprowadzenie. Zakład Wyd. Nomos, Kraków.
Singer P. 1975/2004. Wyzwolenie Zwierząt. PIW, Warszawa.
Singer P. (red.) 2011. W obronie zwierząt. Wyd. Czarna Owca.
Singer P. 2003. Etyka praktyczna, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa.
Singer P. & Mason J., 2006/2012 Etyka a to, co jemy. Wyd. Czarna Owca.
Regan T. 1983. The case for Animal Rights. Uni. of California Press.
Gzyra D. 2015. Zdolność do odczuwania w teorii praw zwierząt Toma Regana. Przegląd Filozoficzny NS 24 (2): 431-446.
Patterson, C. 2003. Wieczna Treblinka. Wyd. Vega!Pol, Opole.
Etyka 18 (1980) PWN Warszawa [tom poświęcony traktowaniu zwierząt]
Elżanowski, A. 2009. Wartość życia podmiotowego z perspektywy nauki. Przegląd Filozoficzny NS 18 (3): 81-96.
DeWaal, F. 2006. Małpy i filozofowie. Copernicus Center Press. Kraków.
Status prawny
Pietrzykowski T. 2016 Ludzkie, niezbyt ludzkie / Esej o podmiotowości prawnej i wyzwaniach XXI wieku. Wyd. Uni. Śląskiego.
Pietrzykowski T. 2015. Problem podmiotowości prawnej zwierząt z perspektywy filozofii prawa . Przegląd Filozoficzny NS 24 (2): 247-260.
Pietrzykowski T. 2007 Spór o prawa zwierząt. Wyd. Sonia Draga, Katowice.
Elżanowski, A & Pietrzykowski, T. 2013. Zwierzęta jako nieosobowe podmioty prawa. Forum Prawnicze 15(1): 18-27.
Wise, S. M. 2000. Rattling the Cage / Toward Legal Rights for Animals. Perseus Publ., Cambridge (Mass.)
Donaldson, S. & Kymlicka, W. 2011. Zoopolis
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: