Critical discourses on work 3500-FAKM-KODP
Work, as a deliberate human action that changes nature, especially formalized as (permanent) employment, is one of the most essential elements of human life: it is the source of identity, social bonds, a sense of purpose, meaning and structure. Such an approach, represented, among others, by Marie Jahoda and the co-authors of the classic study "Marienthal's Unemployed", is challenged by authors who notice the problems of alienation, exploitation, or the subordination of life to work. Critical discourses of work also concern its definition and scope: feminist researchers and theorists propose the concept of reproductive, caring or emotional labour. Moreover, apart from the discourse of the work ethos, there has always been an opposite discourse – refusal of work, as well as political projects to limit it (variously understood). Currently, one of the popular project is the unconditional basic income (which, however, already existed in the 1970s), which already functions in the broad public discourse. During the course, students will learn about current critical discussions about work, as well as their genealogy. The aim of the seminar is to familiarize participants with the arguments of work critics, as well as a reflective discussion on the functions of work, its status, definitions and role in social life.
Subsequent classes will cover the following topics:
• alienation of work,
• refusal of work,
• unpaid work of women,
• emotional labour,
• shadow work,
bullshit jobs,
• precarisation and work-for-employment,
• immaterial labour,
• post-work,
• unconditional basic income
Type of course
Mode
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Assessment criteria
The final grade will be based on the essay (min. 5, max. 8 pages of standardized typescript).
The hours allocated for classes in the classroom (30h) should be increased by the time necessary to prepare for classes (reading literature, preparing notes) - 4h per week and the time necessary to prepare the final essay - 10h.
The criteria for assessing the essay include:
• meeting the formal requirement - the length of the text, proper use of citations and bibliography,
• the sociological nature of the essay,
• understanding the literature discussed,
• proper use of literature in the analysis,
• comprehensibility and logic of the argument.
The grade in the resit session is based on the same principle as in the main session.
Bibliography
B. Russell, „Pochwała lenistwa”
K. Marx, “Rękopisy ekonomiczno-filozoficzne z 1844 r.”
H. Marcuse, “Człowiek jednowymiarowy”
K. Weeks, “The problem with work”
M. Dalla Costa, S. James, “The power of women and the subversion of the community”
A. Russell Hochschild, “Zarządzanie emocjami. Komercjalizacja ludzkich uczuć”
C. Lambert, „Shadow work: The Unpaid, Unseen Jobs That Fill Your Day”
M. Lazzarato, “Immaterial labour”
Zerowork Collective (wybrane teksty)
D. Frayne, “The work refusal”
P. Thompson, „The refusal of work: past, present and future”
M. Fisher, “Prywatyzacja stresu”
G. Standing, “Prekariat. Nowa niebezpieczna klasa”
D. Graeber, „Praca bez sensu”
M. Szlinder, „Bezwarunkowy dochód podstawowy”
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: