Monographic lecture: Word formation for advanced learners 3304-2DXW-WM-002
During the lecture, students will learn to know more refined word-formation techniques than in previous years, including marginal (agrammatical) methods.
They will also examine a hierarchical classification of word-formation techniques, e.g. the reason why suffixation prevails upon conversion.
They will be invited to discuss whether it is appropriate to establish "composition savante" as an independent technique. They will also know why it's difficult to distinguish fracto-composition and mot-valisage (lexical contamination). It will be dislcosed to them what are rules od affixes' competition, and how long at best have to be French derivatives.
Finally, they will hear how Druaz notes words' families, how Polish dervational nests are made, and what are the possibilities of synchronic word-formation basing on the theory of nests and written in nests' symbols.
Mode
Requirements
Prerequisites
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
Having completed this course, the student will:
- understand the terminology and methodology of a number of word-formation
currents,
- freely discuss word formation problems on an academic level.
Assessment criteria
1. Participation in 13 on 15 lectures.
2. A short test at the end of the last encounter.
Practical placement
None
Bibliography
Burkacka I., 2001, Porównawcza analiza gniazdowa wybranych leksemów
neutralnych i nacechowanych ekspresywnie, Warszawa.
Corbin, Danielle (1984) "Méthodes en morphologie dérivationnelle", Cahiers de lexicologie n° 44, Vol. 1, p. 3 à 17.
Fijałkowska W., 2014, Le préfixoïde – un outil de description morphologique
et élément du systeme de la langue française et polonaise, LingVaria (IX),
2014, nr 2 (18), s. 177-191 .
DAL Georgette, „A propos d'une idée reçue, ou de la prétendue irrégularité de la dérivation = About a received idea, or the so-called irregularity of derivation », in : Bulletin de linguistique appliquée et générale, 2002, no 27 , pp. 57-73.
Fradin B.,
Fradin B., Kerleroux F., Plénat M. (eds), 2009, Aperçus de morphologie du français, Saint-Denis: Presses Universiatires de Vincennes.
Gruaz C., 2008, Dictionnaire syncgronique des familles de mots français, Paris, Lambert-Lucas.
Jadacka H., 2007, O hierarchizacji w słowotwórstwie i jej skutkach dla opisu
systemu derywacyjnego (na marginesie książki Iwony Kaproń-
Charzyńskiej Derywacja ujemna w języku polskim. Rzeczowniki i
przymiotniki), „LingVaria) nr 1 (3), s. 9-20.
PLÉNAT M., LIGNON S. (2009), Échangisme suffixal et contraintes phonologiques, in: Aperçus de morphologie du français, Fradin B., Kerleroux F., Plénat M. (eds), 47-63, Saint-Denis: Presses Universiatires de Vincennes.
Plénat., 1993, « Observations sur le mot minimal français » in: De natura sonorum, Laks B. et Plénat M. (eds), 143-172, Saint-Denis: Presses universitaires de Vincennes.
Pruvost J., Sablayrolles J.-F., Les néologismes, PUF, série "Que sais-je?".
Renner V., 2006, "French and English lexical blends in contrast", Languages in Contrast, Volume 19, Issue 1, Jan 2019, p. 27 - 47.
Renner V., 2021, L'apport du concept de tête à l'étude des amalgames lexicaux, in: Morphophonologie, lexicologie et langue de spécialité (Presses Universitaires de Rennes), p. 105-113.
Skarżyński M., 1985, Próba zastosowania analizy gniazdowej do badań
systemu słowotwórczego polszczyzny, Kraków (rozprawa doktorska).
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: