Audiovisual and performative culture in Central and Eastern Europe 3224-D4AUDIO

Knowledge (the student knows and understands):

● Has a basic knowledge and understanding of the specificity of various models of culture from an anthropological perspective (traditional, noble, bourgeois, mass), their transformation processes and interconnections, and their emanations in the symbolic and semiotic spheres, i.e., in the sphere of culture, art, literature, and the history of Central and Eastern European countries [K1_W03]
● Has a basic knowledge and understanding of the history and present of the region (two selected Central and Eastern European countries), as well as issues, concepts, and historical concepts related to the identification of Central and Eastern Europe as a region, with particular emphasis on cultural processes and phenomena in the context of social and political transformations [K1_W04].
● Has a basic knowledge and understanding of the European and global context of cultural processes – can apply this knowledge to the culture, art, literature, linguistic phenomena, as well as the political, social, and economic phenomena of the countries of the region at every stage of their development [K1_W05].
● Has a basic understanding of the broadly defined intercultural context; has knowledge of humans as entities constructing social structures and cultural products, is aware of the principles of their functioning and the resulting differences in the perception of social life by representatives of various nationalities, ideological and religious groups, and variously understood minorities [K1_W07].

Skills (graduates can):
● Can search for, select, analyze, and use necessary information from various sources [K1_U01]
● Can formulate and analyze research problems, select research methods and tools, and conduct simple research under the supervision of a research supervisor in the field of cultural and religious studies and related disciplines related to the Central and Eastern European region [K1_U02]
● Can develop research skills and independently acquire knowledge with the support of a research supervisor; Skillfully formulate thoughts and present research results in the form of oral or written statements (various types) [K1_U03]
● Is able to use theoretical approaches, research paradigms, and concepts appropriate to cultural and religious studies in typical professional situations [K1_U04]
● Is able to conduct a critical analysis of cultural products specific to a given era in the development of two selected countries of Central and Eastern Europe; recognize different types of cultural products of Central and Eastern European countries, analyze them, and distinguish between different perspectives on cultural development, being aware of the existence of differences in cultural identities and context [K1_U05].
● Is able to draw on acquired theoretical and practical knowledge and use it in typical professional statements concerning the history and present day of selected countries in the region, as well as the specificity of the region as a whole in a global context. Construct these statements logically, drawing on the perspectives of other participants in these communication situations [K1_U06]
● Is able to independently prepare written and oral statements, in Polish and a foreign language, on selected topics related to cultural theory and issues affecting countries in the region (culture, political, social, and economic sources, consequences and contexts of cultural phenomena, literature and language as media and cultural evidence, audiovisual and electronic media, social and religious relations and ties, etc.). Present the results of their work in a group setting [K1_U08]

Social competences (the student is ready to):
● Is ready to critically evaluate their knowledge, continuously improve their skills, and supplement their acquired knowledge [K1_K01].
● is ready to participate in cultural life and use its various forms [K1_U05].

I. The organization of classes:

1) Attendance at all classes, covered by the plan, shall be compulsory
2) It is not possible to have a resit if the reason of failing the credit was noncompliance with the requirement to participate in them. In such a case a student can be conditionally registered in an successive stage of study and can repeat the failed course.
3) In case of 30 hours in semester, 2 absences without justifying are acceptable. Missed classes must be made up in accordance with the requirements of the lecturer. The requirements are provided by the lecturer during the first class.

II. Assessment Criteria:
The final grade is composed of:
Substantive participation in classes (40%)
Final oral examination (60%)

Grading system:

0%–49% – 2
50%–60% – 3
61%–70% – 3+
71%–80% – 4
81%–90% – 4+
91%–100% – 5
Additional knowledge – 5+

01. Rose G., Interpretacja materiałów wizualnych. Krytyczna metodologia badań nad wizualnością, Warszawa 2010, s. 19-48.
02.1. Burke P., Naoczność. Materiały wizualne jako świadectwa historyczne, tł. Hunia J., Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2012, s. 164-215.
02.2. Benjamin W., Reprodukcja techniczna, [w:] Kurz I., Kwiatkowska P., Zaremba Ł., (oprac.), Antropologia kultury wizualnej. Zagadnienia i wybór tekstów, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2012, s. 321-329.
03. Łojas J., Komiks [w:] Godlewski G., Karpowicz A., Rakoczy M., Rodak P. (red.), Od aforyzmu do zinu, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytety Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2014, s. 211-220.
04.1. Łojas J., Graffiti [w:] Godlewski G., Karpowicz A., Rakoczy M., Rodak P. (red.), Od aforyzmu do zinu, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytety Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2014, s. 163-174.
04.2. Biskupski Ł., Prosto z ulicy. Sztuki wizualne w dobie mediów społecznościowych i kultura uczestnictwa, Fundacja Bęc Zmiana, Instytut Kultury Polskiej UW, Warszawa 2017, s. 44-84.
05. Demokowicz-Dobrzańska K., Czyim gniewem jest gniew Aguirre?, [w:] Gwóźdź A. (red.), Kino niemieckie w dialogu pokoleń i kultur, Rabid, Kraków 2004, s. 209-221.
06. Brzezińska-Pająk M., Good bye, Lenin !, czyli niemiecka transformacja polityczna w pigułce, [w:] Brzezińska-Pająk M. (red.), Kino – postkomunizm – polityka. Film w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej wobec procesów transformacji politycznej i konsekwencji roku 1989, Libron, Kraków 2018, s. 267-282.
07. Helman A., Radziecka szkoła montażu [w:] Helman A., Ostaszewski J., Historia myśli filmowej. Podręcznik, Wydawnictwo słowo/obraz terytoria, Gdańsk 2010, s. 55-74.
08. Bogusz-Tessmar P., Kaźmierczak N., Królikiewicz N. et al., Film Powrót Andrieja Zwiagincewa w świetle metody twórczej reżysera, [w:] tychże, Nowe kino rosyjskie wobec tradycji literackiej i filmowej, Instytut Filologii Rosyjskiej i Ukraińskiej UAM, Poznań 2017, s. 69-90.
09. Kotowska M., Zambrzycka M., Przeszłość i teraźniejszość w ukraińskim filmie doby transformacji [w:] Brzezińska-Pająk M. (red.), Kino – postkomunizm – polityka. Film w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej wobec procesów transformacji politycznej i konsekwencji roku 1989, Libron, Kraków 2018, s. 165-190.
10. Robert M., Socrealizm à rebours Skowronki na uwięzi Jiřiego Menzla, „Kwartalnik Filmowy” 2009, nr 67-68, s. 261-285.
11. Tkaczewski D., Improwizowana (i prowokowana) „komedia dokumentalna”, czyli Czeski Sen na jawie i Czeski Pokój na bojowo, [w:] Jarząbek K., Ruttar A., Sojda S. (red.), Spotkania międzykulturowe. T. 1, Literaturoznawstwo, kultura, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice 2013, s. 165-189.
12. Schechner R., Przyszłość rytuału, przeł. Tomasz Kubikowski, Oficyna Wydawnicza Wolumen, Warszawa 2000, s. 51-96.
13. Artaud A., Teatr okrucieństwa, [w:] Godlewski G., Kolankiewicz L., Mencwel A., Pęczak M., Antropologia kultury. Zagadnienia i wybór tekstów, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 1998, s. 527-530.
14.1. Kosiński D., Grotowski i performatyka – pierwsze przybliżenia, „Performer” 2012 nr 5 (jesień), dostępny online < https://grotowski.net/performer/performer-5/grotowski-i-performatyka-pierwsze-przyblizenia>.
14.2. Kocur M., Grotowski jako dzieło sztuki – revisited, tekst dostępny online, .