Corpus Linguistics 3223-1ULK

Knowledge:
knows the terminology used in linguistics and related fields at an extended level, is familiar with the most important directions and methods of linguistic research; understands grammatical terminology; has knowledge of selected pragmatic determinants of the language systems in question;
has in-depth knowledge of the methodology and conduct of linguistic or literary research; knows the scientific style and lexis; has knowledge of databases for linguistics, has basic knowledge of the interpretation of data obtained from analysis;
He is familiar with popular computer-aided interpreter software (CAT) and selected programs for frequency and stylometric analysis; he is familiar with the possibilities of using machine translation;

Skills:
uses computer programs useful in the work of a translator, can adequately format text in Polish and at least one foreign language, can efficiently use spreadsheets and diagrams, can use generally available scientific databases (including terminological and corpora databases), can efficiently search information, uses expert knowledge, encyclopedic, language, general scientific terminology, general technical, interdisciplinary and industry dictionaries, language corpora, databases and parallel texts;
is able to indicate gaps in scientific research and directions of its continuation; formulates research problems, selects adequate methods, constructs research tools, develops, presents and interprets research results, draws conclusions;

Social competences:
is able to supplement and improve the acquired knowledge of at least one language of specialisation and of one's own language; is aware of the need to constantly search for new dictionary and text sources, as well as to follow modern scientific theories; reacts quickly to changing realities;
draws conclusions from feedback, knows how to manage time; maintains contact with the translation community, works in a multicultural environment; knows the working environment of a translator;
can work in a group, cooperate with others in appropriate roles (functions); manage a small team (3-4 people in practice groups);

Methods of evaluating student's work
- evaluation of activity and ongoing preparation for classes;
- project (thematic text corpus);
- final written work (stylometric analysis of the corpus).

Evaluation criteria (final evaluation components):
- Continuous assessment from classes: 10%
- project (thematic text corpus): 40%
- final passing: 50%

Examination (final passing):
In the case of a stylometric analysis of the body, the number of points obtained for the individual stylometric parameters is binding.

The rules of scoring for the current assessment and the examination/credit:
55%-69% = 3
70%-74% = 3+
75%-84% = 4
85%-89% = 4+
90%-100% = 5

Principles of cooperation between the teacher and students:
Absences - allowed 3 unjustified absences in a semester (this is in accordance with the regulations).
The final grade can be approached after passing the project and having received a positive assessment of the continuous classes. All tests.
3. the student has the right to double-check each written test. Failure to take the test on the first date without justification will result in the loss of this date.

None

Basic literature:
- Gruszczyńska E., Leńko-Szymanska A. (red.), Polskojęzyczne korpusy równoległe / Polish-language Parallel Corpora, WLS UW, Warszawa, 2016.
- Karpiński Ł., Systemy leksykalno-komunikacyjne, Campidoglio, Warszawa, 2017.
- "Prace filologiczne", tom. LXIII, WP UW, Warszawa 2012 (tom zawierający zbiór prac dot. lingwistyki korpusowej)

Supplementary literature:
- Biber C., Corpus Linguistics. Investigating language structure and use, Cambridge Univesrity Press 1998.
- Celiński P., 2013a, Postmedia. Cyfrowy kod i bazy danych, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.
- Kamińska-Szmaj I., 1989, Słownictwo tekstów popularnonaukowych w ujęciu statystycznym, [w:] „Rozprawy Komisji Językowej”, t. XVI, Wrocławskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Wyd. PAN, Wrocław, s. 69-87.
- Karpiński Ł., Zarys leksykografii terminologicznej, KJS UW, Warszawa, 2008
- Karpiński Ł., 2009a, Wybrane założenia komputerowej analizy tekstów i gromadzenia danych, [w] „Języki Specjalistyczne 9 – Kulturowy i leksykograficzny obraz języków specjalistycznych”, (red. eidem), KJS UW, Warszawa
- Karpiński Ł., 2012a, Analiza parametryczna tekstu a translacja maszynowa – wybrane zagadnienia, [w] „The Linguistic Journal of Applied Linguistics”, (red.), Lingwistyczna Szkoła Wyższa w Warszawie, Warszawa.
- Karpiński Ł., Michałowski P., 2012, Wybrane metody analizy terminologii specjalistycznej (na przykładzie technolektu geografii), [w:] „Edukacja dla Przyszłości”, t. IX, 2012, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Finansów i Zarządzania w Białymstoku, Białystok, s. 19-46.
- Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B., Gramatyka angielska na autentycznych materiałach językowych, Łódź, WSSM 2004.
- Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B., Podstawy językoznawstwa korpusowego, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2005.
- Ludskanow A., 1973, Tłumaczy człowiek i maszyna cyfrowa, WNT, Warszawa
- McEnery T., Wilson A., Corpus Linguistics: an Introduction, Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press, 2001
- Pawłowski A., 2001, Metody kwantytatywne w sekwencyjnej analizie tekstu, Uniwersytet Warszawski Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej, Warszawa.
- Przepiórkowski A., Bańko M., Górski R., Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B., Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, PWN, Warszawa 2012
- Sambor J., 1969, Badania statystyczne nad słownictwem. Na materiale „Pana Tadeusza”, Wrocław-Warszawa.
- Świdziński M., 2006, Lingwistyka korpusowa w Polsce – źródła, stan, perspektywy, [w:] „LingVaria”, nr 1, Wydział Polonistyki UJ, Kraków.
- Tognini-Bonelli E., Corpus Linguistics at Work, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 2001

The author's resources, collections of analyses, visualizations of stylometric data.

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of 3223-1ULK in USOSweb