Contemporary literary life of Ukraine 3222-52ZL1K-N
Detailed issues discussed during the classes include, among others. analysis of selected works of Ukrainian literature in the last 10 years, including the most important debuts of recent years, the phenomenon of popular literature. Maidan discourse and war discourse. We will analyze the causes and directions of development of the so far poorly represented literary genres. The content of the course leads to the development of research skills.
2 ECTS
30 hours in the room - 1 ECTS
30 hours - ongoing preparation, homework, reading, preparation to pass - 1 ECTS
Type of course
Mode
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
The student knows and deeply understands the terminology and methodology of literary studies in the field of contemporary Ukrainian literature. (K2_W02)
The student is able to properly select sources and information derived from them, to make a creative interpretation and presentation of information in the field of Ukrainian literature. (K2_U02)
The student is ready to critically assess their knowledge and the content received. (K2_K01)
Assessment criteria
Conditions for admission to the final pass:
- continuous assessment, i.e. active participation in classes - 50%
- systematic preparation for classes of the given material - 50%
The condition for admission to pass the course is attendance (in accordance with the Study Regulations at the University of Warsaw)
The student has the right to 2 unexcused absences, each subsequent one requires justification. The lecturer decides whether to acknowledge the absence.
The form of crediting the classes in which the student was absent is determined by the lecturer.
Exceeding excused and unjustified absences for 50% of classes may be the basis for failing the course.
Written credit in the form of a term paper.
Term work requirements:
1. The author should formulate a research problem, that is, make a thesis that he will try to verify (prove or disprove) in the work.
2. Before starting to write a thesis, its plan and the list of literature should be consulted with the teacher.
3. The work should be 8-10 pages of standard text, ie the length should not be less than 14,000 characters with spaces and greater than 20,000 characters with spaces (including footnotes). The work should contain a list of the bibliography used (the volume of the list of the bibliography used, however, is not included in the volume of the work specified above).
4. The structure of the work should include: introduction, development, ending, bibliography. The introduction should contain: thesis (formulation of the research problem), objectives of the work, justification for the choice of topic, description of the subject and subject literature. Development: proper analysis of the texts. The ending should include conclusions resulting from the research.
5. Each page of the work must be provided with bibliographic, source or reference notes.
6. The text of the work should be edited in accordance with the following rules: - font: Times New Roman Normal, size 12, - foreign language phrases in italics, - line spacing: 1.5 lines, - standard margins (top, bottom, left and right: 2.5 cm), title of the work: font Times New Roman Normal, size 14, bold.
7. Footnotes should be placed in the text as footnotes, font Times New Roman Normal, size 10, line spacing: 1 line. A footnote is treated like a sentence, so it should start with a capital letter and end with a period. In the text, the number of the footnote should be placed without spaces after the word, before the comma. At the end of the sentence, the footnote number is placed before the period ending the sentence. Notation of footnotes and bibliographies according to SUV standard.
The conditions for a retake pass are the same as for passing in the first term (information above).
The following criteria are used for credits:
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all important aspects - 5.0 (very good)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all significant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some (less important) aspects - 4.0 (good)
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes with the omission of some important aspects and with significant inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes with the omission of significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory plus)
- failure to achieve the assumed learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
Exceeding the absence of excused and unexcused absences for 50% of classes may be the basis for failing the subject.
Written test in the form of a test: 8 open questions, assessment criteria are presented in the form of percentage thresholds (points obtained from the written test)
60% - 68% - 3 (satisfactory)
69% - 77% - 3+ (satisfactory plus)
78% - 86% - 4 (good)
87% - 95% - 4+ (good plus)
96% - 98% - 5 (very good)
99% -100% - 5! (very good with an exclamation mark)
The conditions for passing the correction are the same as those for passing the first date (information above).
The following criteria apply to the credits:
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects - 5.0 (very good)
- achieving the intended learning outcomes covering all significant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes without some (less important) aspects - 4.0 (good)
- achieving the intended learning outcomes without taking into account some important aspects and with material inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory grade plus)
- achieving the intended learning outcomes without taking into account significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory grade plus)
- no achievement of the intended learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
Bibliography
J. Poliszczuk, Hibrydna topohrafija
N. Zborovs’ka, Suchasna masova literatura v Ukrajini jak zahal’nokul’turna problema, „Słovo i chas” 2007
V. Fomenko, Żanr fentezi v ukrajins’kij prozi kincia XX-pochatku XXI stolittooa
A. Harbuz, Miżkul’turnyj dialoh jak problema ukraijins’koho fentezi XXI st.
O. Bondareva, Mif ta antymif u żanrovomu modeliuvanni ukraijins’koji dramaturhiji XX-pochatku XXI st.
J. Pochynok, Ukrajins’ka eksperymental’na poezija kincia XX-pochatku XXI stolittia: tekst, kntekst, intertekst
S. Kryvorudko, Estetychna paradyhma literatury meżi XX-XXI st.
Wybrane utwory: V. Rafaeenki, E. Honczarowej, M. Matios, S. Żadana, L. Jakimchiuk, J. Andruchowycza, A. Ljubki, S. Andruchowycz, O. Lucyschyny, V. Lysa.
V. Rafaeenko, Dovhota dnej
Eseje E. Honczarowa, Des’ poruch vijna
M. Matios, Majze nikoly ne navpaky
S. Zadan, Internat
L. Jakimchuk, Abrykozy Donbasu
V. Lys, Stolittia Jakova
J. Andruchowycz, Kochanci Justyci
O. Lucyschyna, Ljubowne żyttja
S. Andruchowycz Felix Austria
A. Ljubka, dowolny utwór.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: