Ukrainian literature and new technologies 3222-35LUNT2K-N
The course is devoted to the relationships between literature and new technologies in contemporary culture, with particular emphasis on twenty-first-century Ukrainian literature. The classes address the impact of new media and the digital environment on the literary process, the functioning of literary texts on the Internet, and transformations in reading and communication practices. New literary forms are analyzed, including hypertext fiction, interactive literature, digital literature, and texts functioning within social media. The course also discusses changing concepts of the author, the reader, and the text itself in the age of digital culture.
|
Term 2026Z:
The course is devoted to the relationships between literature and new technologies in contemporary culture, with particular emphasis on twenty-first-century Ukrainian literature. The classes address the impact of new media and the digital environment on the literary process, the functioning of literary texts on the Internet, and transformations in reading and communication practices. New literary forms are analyzed, including hypertext fiction, interactive literature, digital literature, and texts functioning within social media. The course also discusses changing concepts of the author, the reader, and the text itself in the age of digital culture. |
Course coordinators
Type of course
General: obligatory courses | Term 2026Z: elective courses |
Mode
Prerequisites (description)
Learning outcomes
Upon completion of the course, the student knows and understands the media context of Ukrainian literature and the contemporary forms of its functioning (K1_W07), is able to search for, critically analyze, evaluate, select, and utilize information concerning Ukrainian literature (K1_U03), is able to apply theoretical approaches proper to Ukrainian literary studies (K1_U04), is able to formulate and solve a research problem within the field of Ukrainian literary studies (K1_U06), and is ready to critically evaluate their own knowledge and the received content (K1_K01).
Assessment criteria
Written test. Requirements for passing the course and admission to the exam: continuous assessment, meaning active participation in class, and systematic preparation of the assigned material for each class. The following criteria are applied for grading: achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all significant aspects – 5.0 (very good); achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all significant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies – 4.5 (good plus); achievement of the assumed learning outcomes omitting certain (less significant) aspects – 4.0 (good); achievement of the assumed learning outcomes omitting certain significant aspects and with significant inaccuracies – 3.5 (satisfactory plus); achievement of the assumed learning outcomes omitting significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies – 3.0 (satisfactory); failure to achieve the assumed learning outcomes – 2.0 (unsatisfactory). Grading components: continuous, formative assessment (current preparation for class, activity) – 50%. The final grade consists of work during the semester (30%) and the exam result (70%). The course ends with a written exam / a graded pass, where the evaluation criteria are presented in the form of percentage thresholds (points obtained from the oral and written exam): 60% – 68% - 3 (satisfactory), 69% - 77% - 3+ (satisfactory plus), 78% - 85% - 4 (good), 86% - 91% - 4+ (good plus), 92% - 97% - 5 (very good), 98% - 100% - 5! (very good with an exclamation mark). The condition for admission to the course assessment is also attendance in class (in accordance with the UW Study Regulations). The student is entitled to 2 (out of 30 hours) unexcused absences; every subsequent absence requires submission of an excuse. The acceptance of the excuse is determined by the lecturer. The form of making up for classes from which the student was absent is determined by the lecturer. Exceeding excused and unexcused absences by 50% of classes may be grounds for failing the course.
Bibliography
Jerzy Grzenia, Komunikacja językowa w internecie, Warszawa 2006, s. 97-173.
Monika Górska-Olesińska, Słowo w sieci. Elektroniczne dyskursy, Opole 2009, s. 13-41.
Maciej Maryl, Technologie literatury: wpływ nośnika na formę i funkcje przekazów literackich, Pamiętnik Literacki 101/2, 157-178.
Piotr Marecki, Linternet, w: Linternet. Literatura i Internet, red. P. Marecki, s. 5-22.
Mirosław Filiciak, Druk kontra piksele. Hipertekst w literaturze, w: Linternet. Literatura i Internet, red. P. Marecki, s. 119-127.
Grzegorz Jankowicz, Granice hipertekstu?, w: Linternet. Literatura i Internet, red. P. Marecki, s. 151-159.
Maria Cywińska-Milonaś, Blogi (ujęcie psychologiczne), w: Linternet. Literatura i Internet, red. P. Marecki, s. 95-110.
oraz inne teksty w zależności od potrzeb grupy
|
Term 2026Z:
Jerzy Grzenia, Komunikacja językowa w internecie, Warszawa 2006, s. 97-173. |