Literature and the shaping of Ukrainian national identity in the 19th century
3222-30LUTN3K-N
During the course, Ukrainian literature will be discussed in the context of the formation of the idea of a modern Ukrainian nation and the formation of national identity. Particular attention will be devoted to the romantic understanding of history, historiosophy and revolution. We will analyze categories of people and references to nature present in Ukrainian literature. Finally, elements of tyrheism, the idea of messianism and calling for Slavic reciprocity will be discussed.
Student workload
30 hours in the room - 1 ECTS
45 hours preparation for classes - 1.5 ECTS
15 hours preparation to pass - 0.5 ECTS
If it is not possible to conduct classes in a stationary form, classes will take place using distance communication tools, most likely Google Meet and others recommended by the University of Warsaw.
|
Term 2026Z:
I. Theoretical and Methodological Introduction • Definitions of National Identity: The nation as an "imagined community" (B. Anderson); ethnos versus the modern political nation. • Literature as a Nation-Building Institution: The role of the literary text in the absence of statehood; the concept of the subaltern and the reclaiming of one's own voice. • The Geopolitical Context of the Turn of the Centuries: Political and cultural shifts at the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century following the liquidation of the Hetmanate's autonomy and the destruction of the Zaporozhian Sich by the Tsarist regime. II. The Modern Turning Point: The Nobilitation of Language and the Common People (Late 18th Century – 1820s) • The Beginnings of Modern Literature as an Act of Linguistic Emancipation: The predominance of poetry and drama. Ivan Kotliarevsky’s Eneida and its deep national character—the literary resurrection of the Cossack ethos under a classical guise. • The Travesty-Burlesque Trend: Coding identity and circumventing censorship through "low" literary forms (Kotliarevshchyna). • Cultural Topography—The Role of Poltava: Poltava as the first center of literary life. The birth of new drama and theater in Ukraine (Poltava, Kharkiv)—the works of I. Kotliarevsky and H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko (comic opera, comedy of manners) as a psychological portrait of society. • Overcoming the Provincial Complex in Prose: The first prose works of H. Kvitka-Osnovianenko. The dominance of Sentimentalism as an attempt to prove the aesthetic equivalence of the Ukrainian language in expressing "sublime feelings." • The Crucible of the Modern Intelligentsia: The establishment and significance of Kharkiv University (1805) for the institutional development of Ukrainian culture and science. The beginnings of the press and its role in building social cohesion. • Ukrainian Preromanticism in a European Context: The works of P. Hulak-Artemovsky. Adaptations of Polish and German ballads, translation activities (propagating the works of A. Mickiewicz) as an opening of the culture to Western models. III. The Romantic Breakthrough and the "Invention of Tradition" (1820s–1840s) • From Burlesque to Seriousness: Ideological attempts to move away from Kotliarevshchyna toward high literature. The birth of Ukrainian Romanticism. • The Archiving of Memory as a Foundation of Identity: The development of modern social, philosophical, and religious thought. The myth-making role of the History of the Rus' and the earliest historical scholarship. • Folklore as the Sacred Text of the Nation: Ethnographic interests; pioneering collections of folk songs by M. Tsertelev and M. Maksymovych. The emergence of almanacs as spaces for communal consolidation. Social determinants of the Romantic breakthrough. • The Geography of Ukrainian Romanticism: The evolution, periodization, and regional specificity of the movement: The Kharkiv Romantic School (1820s–1830s): (L. Borovykovsky, M. Kostomarov, A. Metlynsky, et al.). The sentimental-morbid character of poetry, existential dread over the extinction of the nation, and the idealization of the past. The historical tragedies of M. Kostomarov. Romanticism in Galicia (1830s): National awakening in the grip of Polish cultural dominance and Austrian administration. The activities of the "Ruthenian Triad" (M. Shashkevych, I. Vahylevych, Ya. Holovatsky) in education, publishing, and scholarship. The almanac Rusalka Dnistrova (1837) as a manifesto of breaking with Old Church Slavonic and the birth of modern literature in Galicia. The Kyiv Period (1830s–1850s): The transition from cultural Romanticism to political identity. The emergence, independence program, and historical significance of the Brotherhood of Saints Cyril and Methodius. IV. Taras Shevchenko—Demiurge and Codifier of the Nation • Shevchenko as an Icon and an Institution: The life and work of the central figure in the Ukrainian cultural universe; the process of establishing his status as the national bard (prokrok / viescz). • Poetic Evolution and the Maturation of the National Idea: The path from Romantic folklorism to radical political poetry and historiosophy. Richness of forms (lyrics, satire, pamphlet, historical-philosophical mystery play). • Reckoning with History and the Deconstruction of Imperial Myths: The historical-patriotic trend. Anti-Tsarist and social radicalism (the anti-colonial dimension of the poems The Dream and The Caucasus). The reshaping of Ukrainian politics of memory—the shifting stance toward the figure of Bohdan Khmelnytsky (critique of the Treaty of Pereyaslav). • The Bible and Ukrainian Messianism: Biblical and religious motifs as a tool for describing the nation's suffering and prophesying its resurrection. Shifting views on the role of the poet as a guide for the community. • Europeanization Through Originality: Shevchenko’s role in definitively establishing a self-sustained Ukrainian literature of European stature. • Romantic Genology in the Service of Identity: Genre development and transformation (ballad, dumka, poem, historical tragedy, romantic prose) as evidence of the maturity of the literary system. V. Facing Tsarist Prohibitions: The Struggle for Survival and the Realist Turn (Second Half of the 19th Century) • Identity Under Oppression and Political Trauma: Characteristics of socio-political processes (the Emancipation Reform of 1861). Attempts at systemic culturicide and linguicide: the Valuev Circular (1863) and the Ems Ukaz (1876) as barriers to identity development; the phenomenon of transferring publishing activities to Galicia (the "Ukrainian Piedmont"). • Consolidation of the Elites: The role of the St. Petersburg-based journal Osnova (1860s) as a nationwide platform for discussion and integration. • Aesthetic Evolution as a Search for Social Truth: The specificity of Ukrainian Realism—the path from the ethnographic-romantic trend to critical Naturalism and social engagement. VI. Iwan Franko and the Modernization of Identity (Turn of the 19th and 20th Centuries) • The Shift from Myth to Organic Work: The career of Ivan Franko as the second most vital figure in the Ukrainian pantheon. The concept of "programmatic service to the nation" replacing Romantic prophetism. The writer as an institution: poet, prose writer, playwright, scholar, and publicist. • A New Era of Ukrainian Poetry: The thematic and formal diversity of Franko’s lyric poetry. The poem Moses as a philosophical and historiosophical study of a nation emerging from a colonial mentality. • Socialism, Naturalism, and the Emancipation of the People: Tendentious-publicistic prose and an innovative approach to working-class themes (Boryslav Is Laughing). The economic emancipation of the peasantry and workers as a prerequisite for building a modern nation. • In Dialogue and Conflict with Neighbors: Multi-layered, complex relations between Franko and the Poles. His literary creation and journalism in the Polish language as an attempt to emancipate Ukrainian identity within multicultural Galicia, and to definitively sever the umbilical cord of Polish cultural dominance.
|
Course coordinators
Type of course
obligatory courses
Mode
Remote learning
Prerequisites (description)
Before starting the didactic cycle, students should have knowledge of history and ancient Ukrainian literature.
Learning outcomes
Students will gain advanced knowledge and understanding of the history and contexts of Ukrainian literature K1_W07
Student is able to search, critically analyse and evaluate, select and use information concerning Ukrainian literature K1_U03
Student is able to plan and organise individual and team work K1_U12
Students are able to critically evaluate their knowledge and perceived contents K1_K01
Assessment criteria
The condition of passing the course and admission to the final pass is:
• systematic preparation of given material for classes - continuous assessment, shaping 50%
• conducting and writing an individual research project 50%
The course ends with a written exam according to the following criteria presented in the form of percentage thresholds
60% - 68% - 3 (satisfactory)
69% - 77% - 3+ (satisfactory plus)
78% - 86% - 4 (good)
87% - 93% - 4+ (good plus)
94% - 97% - 5 (very good)
98% -100% - 5! (very good with an exclamation mark)
Assessment Criteria:
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant
aspects - 5.0 (very good)
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes covering all relevant
aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus)
- achieving the intended learning outcomes without some (less
significant) aspects - 4.0 (good)
- achieving the assumed learning outcomes without some important ones
aspects and with material inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)
- achieving the intended learning outcomes bypassing relevant aspects
or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory, plus)
- no achievement of the intended learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
The student has the right to three unexcused absences, each subsequent one requires submission of justification.
Classes during which the student was absent can be lecturers on call.
Exceeding the absence of excused and unexcused absences for 50% of classes may be the basis for failing the subject.
The student has the right to take the exam in the retake session in the same form as in the basic session and on condition of obtaining credit for the subject.
Bibliography
I. Kotlarewski, Eneida
I. Kotlarewski, Natałka Połtawka
Lewko Borowykowśkyj, Marusia,
Ambrosij Metłyński, Bandura, Smert' bandurysta, Ridna mowa
Mykoła Kostomarow, Spiweć Mytusa
Markian Szaszkewycz, Bolesław Krywoustyj pid Hałyczem, Naływajko, Ruska mowa,
Jakiw Hołowacki, Smert' myłych
Iwan Wahylewycz, Madej
Taras Szewczenko, Kobzar,
Pantelejmon Kulisz, Czorna rada, Do Kobzaria
I. Franko, Z werszyn I nyzyn, Ziwjale lystia, Mojsej, Zachar Berkut (fragm.)
D. Czyżewskij, Istorija ukraińskoji literatury, Ternopil 1995.
Istorija ukrainśkoji literatury XIX st. u 3 kn. Za red. M. T. Jacenka, Kyiv 1993-95.
S. Kozak Preromantyzm ukraiński, Warszawa 2003.
G. Grabowycz, Narysy do istorii ukraińskoji literatury, Kyiv 1998.
S. Kozak, Ukraińscy spiskowcy I mesjaniści. Bractwo Cyryla I Metodego, Warszawa 1990.
W. Mokry, “Ruska Trójca”. Karta z dziejów życia literackiegi Ukraińców w Galicji w pierwszej połowie XIX w., Kraków 1997.
|
Term 2026Z:
S. Kozak, Ukraińscy spiskowcy I mesjaniści. Bractwo Cyryla I Metodego, Warszawa 1990. W. Mokry, Literatura i myśl filozoficzno-religijna ukraińskiego romantyzmu, Kraków 1996. W. Mokry, “Ruska Trójca”. Karta z dziejów życia literackiegi Ukraińców w Galicji w pierwszej połowie XIX w., Kraków 1997. W. Iwaszkiw, Ukrainśka romantyczna drama 30-80 rokiv XIX st., Kyiv 1981. O. Zabużko, Filosofija ukrainśkoji idei ta jewropejśkyj kontekst, Kyiv 1993. P. P. Pyłypowycz, Literaturno krytyczni statti, Kyiv 1993. S. Jefremov, Literaturno-krytyczni statti, Kyiv 1993. T. Komaryneć, Idejno-estetyczni isnovy ukrainśkoho romantyzmu, Lviv 1983. Beauvois D., Trójkąt ukraiński. Szlachta, carat i lud na Wołyniu, Podolu i Kijowszczyźnie (1793–1914), Lublin 2005. John-Paul Himka, Galician Villagers and the Ukrainian National Movement in the Nineteenth Century, Edmonton 1988. Hrycak J., Prorok we własnym kraju. Iwan Franko i jego wspólnota (1856–1886), Warszawa 2011. Magocsi P. R., A History of Ukraine: The Land and Its Peoples, Toronto 2010. Serczyk W., Historia Ukrainy, Wrocław 2001.
|