Directions of development in contemporary Ukrainian literature 3222-30KRLU1K-N

After completing the course, students will:
know and understand the media context of Ukrainian literature and contemporary forms of literature (K1_W07)
be able to search for, critically analyse and evaluate, select and use information on Ukrainian literature (K1_U03)
be able to use theoretical approaches specific to Ukrainian literature (K1_U04)
formulate and solve a research task in the field of Ukrainian literary studies (K1_U06)
be ready to critically evaluate their knowledge and the content they receive (K1_K01)

Written exam.
Conditions for passing the course and admission to the exam:
- continuous assessment, i.e. active participation in classes;
- systematic preparation for classes of the assigned material.
The following criteria are used for passing:
- achievement of the intended learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects – 5.0 (very good grade)
- achieving the expected learning outcomes covering all relevant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies – 4.5 (good plus grade)
- achieving the expected learning outcomes with some (less relevant) aspects omitted – 4.0 (good grade)
- achievement of the expected learning outcomes with omission of some relevant aspects and significant inaccuracies – 3.5 (sufficient plus)
- achievement of the expected learning outcomes with omission of relevant aspects or serious inaccuracies – 3.0 (sufficient plus)
- failure to achieve the expected learning outcomes – 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
Assessment components:
- continuous assessment (current preparation for classes, activity) – 50%
The final grade consists of work during the semester (30%) and the exam result (70%).
The course ends with a written exam/pass grade, where the assessment criteria are presented in the form of percentage thresholds (points obtained from the oral and written exams).
60% – 68% - 3 (satisfactory)
69% - 77% - 3+ (satisfactory plus)
78% - 85% - 4 (good)
86% - 91% - 4+ (good plus)
92% - 97% - 5 (very good grade)
98% -100% - 5 !(very good grade with an exclamation mark)
Attendance at classes is also a condition for passing the course (in accordance with the Regulations for Studies at the University of Warsaw).
Students are allowed 2 (out of 30 hours) unexcused absences; each subsequent absence requires an excuse. The lecturer decides whether to accept the excuse.
The form of assessment for classes that the student was absent from is determined by the lecturer.
Exceeding 50% of excused and unexcused absences may be grounds for failing the course.

Krystyna Wilkoszewska, Wariacje na postmodernizm, Kraków 2000.
Mieczysław Dąbrowski, Postmodernizm: myśl i tekst, Kraków 2000.
Ryszard Nycz, Tekstowy świat. Poststrukturalizm a wiedza o literaturze, Kraków 2000.
Zygmunt Bauman, Ponowoczesność jako źródło cierpień, Warszawa 2000.
Margaret Mead, Kultura i tożsamość. Studium dystansu międzypokoleniowego, Warszawa 1978.
Postmodernizm. Antologia przekładów, red. Ryszard Nycz, Kraków 1996.
Postmodernizm a filozofia. Wybór tekstów, red. S. Czerniak, A. Szahaj, Warszawa 1996.
Rybo-wino-kur. Antologia literatury ukraińskiej ostatnich dwudziestu lat, Świat Literacki i Tyrsa, Warszawa 1994.
„Literatura na świecie” nr 5/1991; nr 10/1995/; nr 4/1999.
Ihor Kałyneć, Podsumowując milczenie, Świat Literacki i Tyrsa, Warszawa 1995.
Ігор Калинець, Пробуджена муза. Поезії, Видавництво Канадського Університету Українських Студій, Варшава 1991.
Wasyl Hołoborod’ko, Ikar na motylich skrzydłach, Świat Literacki i Tyrsa, Warszawa 1995.
Іван Дзюба, У дивосвіті рідної хати. Кілька слів про поета, який щойно починається, «Дніпро», квітень, № 4, 1965, сс. 146–152.
Władysław A. Serczyk, Historia Ukrainy, Ossolineum, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków 2001.

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of 3222-30KRLU1K-N in USOSweb