History of Belarusian literature - 20th century (1930-1960) 3221-S1-FBA-HLB31
During the course literature processes that occured in Belarus in 1930-1960 are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the meaning of political changes for Belarusian literature development: the meaning and characteristic of belarutenization in 1920’s, representatives of both generations relationships to communism, socialist realism influence on literature process forming in Belarus. There are also discussed such problems as: individual life stories of particular writers in the context of social and political changes: authorities repressions in 1930’s and their consequences, an idea and meaning of fictional Liberation of Belarus Organisation. The work of particular novelists and poets is also considered for relations with social realism. In such a context chosen motives are analysed: national identity and its implications, folklore, fatherland, mother, countryside, social role and character of family in communistic reality, collectivisation and kulaks problem, lives of former decision makers, partisan war, collaboration, etc. In particular works there are also emphasised esthetical values that have an influence on Belarusian literature development: imaginism, expressionism, psychologism, behaviourism and other. There are discussed such Belarusian writers works as: Kuzma Chorny: novels „Lavon Bushmar”, „Luba Luk’ianskaya”, „Poshuki buduchyni”; Maxim Tank: poems; Kandrat Krapiva: dramas: „Hto smiayetsa aposhnim”, „Partysany”, chosen fables, "Chwiados -- czarwony nos"; Iwan Mieleż: "Paleskaja chronika", Iwan Szamiakin: "Snieżnyja zimy", "Handlarka i paet", Janka Bryl: "Ptuszki i hniozdy", Aleś Adamowicz: "Chatynskaja apowieść", Wasil Bykau: "żurauliny kryk", "Miortwym nie balić", "Kruhlanski most", Uładzimir Karatkiewicz: "Dzikaje palawannie karala Stacha", "Cyhanski karol", Laddzia rospaczy".
Exercises are designed to deepen the knowledge acquinted during the lecture, to develop skills helping in understanding a literary text.
Estimated number of hours that a student should spend on mastering the content is approximately - 90 (60 hrs. of classes and 30 hours. of indyvidual studying)
Type of course
Mode
Requirements
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
Knowledge: the graduate knows and understands
K1_W02 at an advanced level, subject and methodological specificity of literary studies
K1_W04 with an advanced degree of literary terminology
K1_W07 at an advanced level, the historical and literary process and understands the impact of historical and cultural changes on its development
K1_W12 to an advanced degree theories and concepts in the field of the history of ideas
Skills: the graduate can
K1_U01 search, analyze, evaluate, select and use information with the use of multilingual sources, including internet sources
K1_U03 formulate and analyze research problems in the field of literary studies, select research methods and tools K1_U05 use theoretical approaches, research paradigms and concepts specific to literary studies when communicating with the environment and during debates and discussions
K1_U06 recognize various types of literature products and conduct their critical analysis and interpretation in a broader context
K1_U08 substantively argue and formulate conclusions using views
K1_U11 prepare oral presentations in Polish and a foreign language on specific issues, using theoretical approaches, as well as various sources of other authors in Polish and a foreign language
K1_U14 plan and organize individual work and cooperate in a team (also as part of interdisciplinary tasks)
K1_U15 independently plan and implement own learning throughout life
Social competences: the graduate is ready to
K1_K01 critical evaluation of knowledge and content received
K1_K02 recognition of the importance of knowledge in solving cognitive and practical problems and reaching for expert opinions
K1_K04 correct identification and resolution of professional dilemmas in accordance with the traditions and principles of professional ethics
Assessment criteria
The final grade will take into account the student's activeness in the classroom and oral answers given at the end of the semester, when responding to three questions drawn by the student, covering the entire range of material discussed during the classes. While assessing activeness, attention will be focused mainly on the insight contained in the analysis of selected work, while during the oral response it will focus on the students’ understanding of literature-forming processes and their knowledge of the discussed contexts of the literature.
Form of the exam: oral
During the exam questions are asked concerning issues covered during the lectures and classes.
I. Number of questions: 3.
II. Question scoring: from 3 to 0.
III. Points converter for grades:
4.5-5 points - satisfactory (3.0)
5.5-6 points - satisfactory + (3.5)
6.5-7 points - good (4.0)
7.5-8 points - good + (4.5)
8.5-9 points - very good (5.0)
9+ points - very good! (5!)
Pts. 3
Student: characterises an era, period or literary movement with the use of various determinants (philosophical, ideological, poetic, etc.), recalls the names of notable figures (including secondary), shows a detailed knowledge of the content of texts, performs a comprehensive analysis (referring to the genre, structure and content), lists various research positions, and places a writer's oeuvre and work in the historical-literary process. Their response is spontaneous, comprehensive, well-thought-out, and the student uses specialist terminology extensively.
Pts. 2
Student: characterises an era, period or literary movement, shows knowledge of the content of texts, performs analysis (referring to the genre, structure and content), puts a writer's oeuvre and work in the context of the era. Their response is fluent, and the student uses specialist terminology.
Pts. 1
Student: to a limited extent, after additional questions are asked, characterises an era, period or literary movement, demonstrates basic knowledge of the content of texts, performs analysis at a basic level (referring only to content), lists only a few figures from the movement and their work, indicates only constitutive features of the era, period or literary movement. Their response is hesitant; consists of incohesive information, and the student requires guidance from the examiner.
Requirements for grade 5!
- 3 points for each question,
- meeting the requirements for 3 points and additionally: knowledge and skills from outside the curriculum, knowledge of reading beyond the reading list, references to world literature.
Bibliography
1. „Historyja biełaruskaj litaratury XX st., t. 2: 1921-1941; Mińsk 1999
2. „Historyja biełaruskaj litaratury XX st., t. 3: 1941-1965, Minsk 2002
3. „Historyja biełaruskaj litaratury XX st., t. 4, kn. 1: 1966-1985, Minsk 2004
4. Mìhasʹ Tyčyna, Fìlasofìâ lìtaratury: Belaruskì varyânt, Belaruskaâ navuka, Mìnsk 2014, 325 s.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: