Visualisation of research results (workshops) 2800-AOWVIS-MA2
During the course, students will learn the principles of visual documentation and data
visualisation in archaeology, combining theoretical background with practical training.
Classes are conducted in a mixed format of lectures and hands-on exercises using
graphic and 3D software commonly applied in archaeological documentation. The main
objective is to prepare students for independent graphic work related to the digitalisation,
processing, and presentation of data from archaeological research.
The course covers both historical and modern documentation methods, including the
analysis and digital reworking of archival materials as well as the creation of new plans,
profiles, and artefact drawings. Students are introduced to the basic rules of scientific
graphic design, working with raster and vector graphics, and preparing publication-
quality illustrations. Additional topics include spatial data visualisation, the use of map
backgrounds and orthophotography, introductory GIS principles, and the basics of photogrammetry and 3D data. The course concludes with an overview of transferring 3D
data into 2D visualisations and the broader possibilities and limitations of graphic and 3D
visualisation in archaeological research.
Type of course
Mode
Course coordinators
Term 2024Z: | Term 2025L: |
Learning outcomes
Knowledge: K_W03; K_W09; K_W13
Has advanced knowledge in the description, analysis, and interpretation of
archaeological documentation; possesses in-depth knowledge of methods and
techniques for documenting archaeological sources; knows and understands advanced
methods of analyzing and interpreting information contained in scholarly publications.
Skills: K_U03; K_U06; K_U09; K_U13
The student is able to:
creatively apply existing methods and techniques of spatial data collection, adapting
them to the needs arising from the specific nature of the issues under study;
independently analyze and interpret various types of spatial data, including
consideration of their context, using the latest research achievements in order to
determine their significance and impact within the socio-cultural process; select
appropriate methods for presenting the results of their research, also making use of
advanced information and communication technologies.
Social competences: K_K01; K_K04; K_K06
The student is ready to:
use the knowledge and skills they possess and is able to confront them with the opinions
of experts, especially from the fields of the exact sciences and life sciences;
critically assess interpretations of archaeological and historical sources using a multi-
faceted interpretative approach;
disseminate knowledge about cultural heritage through clear presentation of research
data.
Bibliography
Barker. P. (1977) Techniques of archaeological excavations.
https://archive.org/details/techniquesofarch0000bark
Renfrew C., Bahn P.G. (2020) Archaeology: theories, methods and practice
Croix S., Deckers, P., Feveile, C., Knudsen, M., Ovistgaard, S.S., Sindbaek S.M.,
Wouters, B. (2019) Single context, Metacontext, and high-definition archaeology:
Integrating new standards of stratigraphic excavation and recording. Journal of
Archaeological Method and theory.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-019-09417-x
Harris E.C. (1989) Principles of archaeological stratigraphy.
Kimball, J. (2014). 3D Delineation: A modernisation of drawing methodology for field
archaeology (Master's Thesis). Lund University Publications
https://www.academia.edu/7336679/3D_Delineation_A_modernisation_of_drawing_met
hodology_for_field_archaeology_Masters_Thesis_
Lanjouw T. (2014) Discussing the Obvious or Defending the Contested: Why Are We
Still Discussing the “Scientific Value” of 3D applications in Archaeology? The three
dimensions of archaeology: Proceedings of the XVII UISPP World Congress, vol. 7, p. 1-
12
https://www.academia.edu/34588931/Discussing_the_Obvious_or_Defending_the_Cont
ested_Why_Are_We_Still_Discussing_the_Scientific_Value_of_3D_applications_in_Arc
haeology
Morgan C., Wright, H. (2018) Pencils and Pixels: drawing and digital media in
archaeological field recording. Journal of field archaeology, vol 43 (2), p. 136-151.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488
Petrie, F., Matthew, W., (1904) Methods and aims in archaeology.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/63311
Sosna D., Galeta P., Smejda L., Sladek, V., Bruzek, J. (2012) Burials and graphs:
Relational approach to mortuary analysis. Social Science Computer Review, 31(I), p. 56-
70.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0894439312453277
Thompson J.C., Welling, M., Gomani-Chindebvu, E., (2013) Using GIS to integrate old
and new archaeological data from Stone Age deposits in Karonga, Malawi. International
Journal of Heritage in the Digital Era, vol. 2, number 4, p. 612-630.
https://scispace.com/pdf/using-gis-to-integrate-old-and-new-archaeological-data-from-
2d59gha0xn.pdf
Wheeler M. (1954) Archaeology from the earth. Oxford
https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.1711
Additional literature will be provided during the course.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: