Foreign policy of ASEAN countries 2104-M-D3PZPA-SRG
Course Content
1. The Significance of Southeast Asia in the Asia-Pacific Region
2. National Identity in ASEAN Countries in the Context of Ethnic and Religious Diversity
3. Historical, Regional, and Global Determinants of Foreign Policy-Making in ASEAN Countries
4. U.S.–China–ASEAN Relations
5. Foreign Policies of Individual ASEAN Countries – Case Studies:
Indonesia
Thailand
Vietnam
Laos
Cambodia
Malaysia
the Philippines
Myanmar
Singapore
Brunei
Timor-Leste
Student Workload (ECTS Credits)
Type of Student Activity / Workload in Hours
Contact hours: Participation in classroom seminars – 30 hours
Contact hours: Consultations with the course instructor during office hours – 5 hours
Independent study: Reading the required literature and preparation for classes – 15 hours
Independent study: Teamwork and preparation of a multimedia presentation – 10 hours
Independent study: Individual study and preparation for the written test – 15 hours
TOTAL STUDENT WORKLOAD: 75 hours
NUMBER OF ECTS CREDITS: 3.0 ECTS
|
Term 2025Z:
1. The importance of Southeast Asia in the Asia-Pacific region; |
Course coordinators
Term 2026Z: | Term 2025Z: |
Type of course
Mode
Prerequisites (description)
Learning outcomes
KNOWLEDGE
Upon completion of the course:
• the student has in-depth knowledge of the position and significance of Southeast Asia within the Asia-Pacific region;
• the student has in-depth knowledge of the historical, cultural, social, economic, military, and other factors shaping developments in Southeast Asia;
• the student has in-depth knowledge of the foreign policies of all Southeast Asian countries;
• the student understands the underlying principles, determinants, and rationale of the foreign policies of ASEAN countries.
SKILLS
Upon completion of the course:
• the student is able to independently search for and analyse information concerning ASEAN and the foreign policies of its member states;
• the student is able to analyse and anticipate developments and trends in the foreign policies of ASEAN countries;
• the student is able to interpret and explain differences among the foreign policies of individual ASEAN countries.
SOCIAL COMPETENCES
Upon completion of the course:
• the student is prepared to understand and assess foreign policy while taking into account the development needs and perspectives of less-developed countries;
• the student is able to effectively apply the acquired knowledge in professional activities and social contexts;
• the student is open to and respectful of different perspectives arising from cultural differences;
• the student has acquired basic competences relevant to working as an analyst or mid-level specialist in public administration, international organisations and institutions, including ASEAN, or national institutions cooperating with Southeast Asian countries.
Assessment criteria
Teaching Methods
The following teaching methods are used during the course to achieve the course-specific learning outcomes assigned to the course:
1. Interactive lecture supported by multimedia presentations
Learning outcomes addressed:
K_W01, K_W02, K_W03, K_W04
2. Moderated academic discussion
Learning outcomes addressed:
K_W01, K_W02, K_W03, K_W04; K_U03; K_K01; K_K
3. Project-based learning (teams of two students)
Learning outcomes addressed:
K_U01, K_U02, K_U03; K_K01; K_K04
4. Case study analysis (as part of academic discussion)
Learning outcomes addressed:
K_W04; K_U02; K_U03; K_K01; K_K04
Course Assessment Requirements
Active participation in class – maximum 10 points
Presentation – maximum 30 points
Written test at the end of the semester – maximum 60 points
Minimum total score required to pass the course – 60 points
Attendance requirement: a maximum of two unexcused absences per semester is permitted. An absence may be excused upon presentation of a medical certificate.
The course is assessed with a final grade.
Final Grading Scale
The following grading scale applies:
Below 60 points: Grade 2.0 (Fail) – failure to achieve the minimum learning outcomes required for the course.
60–67 points: Grade 3.0 (Satisfactory) – minimum achievement of the required criteria, demonstrating primarily reproductive knowledge.
68–75 points: Grade 3.5 (Satisfactory Plus) – correct achievement of the required criteria.
76–83 points: Grade 4.0 (Good) – good achievement of the required criteria.
84–91 points: Grade 4.5 (Good Plus) – high level of engagement and more than good achievement of the required criteria.
92–100 points: Grade 5.0 (Very Good) – outstanding knowledge and very good achievement of the required criteria.
Mandatory Preparation and Delivery of a Presentation – Group Project
Preparation and delivery of the presentation/group project are mandatory.
The presentation/project must be prepared independently and in accordance with academic ethics, intellectual property protection requirements, and the regulations of the University of Warsaw and the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies (WNPiSM) concerning the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools.
The applicable regulations include:
Resolution No. 14 of the University Council for Education of 13 July 2020 on guidelines concerning standards and procedures applicable in cases where course assignments and degree theses are prepared in violation of the law at the University of Warsaw;
Resolution No. 98 of the University Council for Education of the University of Warsaw of 8 December 2023 on guidelines concerning the use of artificial intelligence tools in the educational process;
Resolution No. 29/2025 of the Teaching Council of the Faculty of Political Science and International Studies (WNPiSM) of 7 May 2025 on detailed rules governing the use of artificial intelligence tools in the educational process.
Permitted level of AI use: Level 3.
Methods for Verification of Course Learning Outcomes
1. Final Examination
(Written final test comprising closed-ended and open-ended questions)
Learning outcomes assessed:
K_W01; K_W02; K_W03; K_W04; K_U01
Weight and points:
60% of the final grade – maximum 60 points
2. Group Project
(Multimedia presentation and oral presentation)
Learning outcomes assessed:
K_U02 – formulating conclusions and presentation skills;
K_K01 – cooperation and ethical conduct.
Weight and points:
30% of the final grade – maximum 30 points
3. Assessment of Ongoing Class Participation
(Participation in discussions and workshop activities based on assigned readings)
Learning outcomes assessed:
K_W01 – identification of relevant determinants;
K_U01 – critical analysis;
K_K01 – objective self-assessment.
Weight and points:
10% of the final grade – maximum 10 points
TOTAL
All of the above learning outcomes: 100% / Maximum 100 points
Bibliography
Szpak A., M. Dahl (red.), Wprowadzenie do polityki zagranicznej państw członkowskich ASEAN, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 2021.
Haliżak E. (1999), Stosunki międzynarodowe w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
Gawlikowski K. (red.) (2004), Azja Wschodnia na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Stosunki międzynarodowe i gospodarcze, Wydawnictwo Trio, Warszawa.
Nawrot K.A. (2021), Współpraca i integracja gospodarcza Azji Wschodniej. Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Materials shared by the teacher.
Course materials.
|
Term 2025Z:
E. Haliżak, International Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region, Warsaw 1999; |
Term 2026Z:
Szpak A., M. Dahl (red.), Wprowadzenie do polityki zagranicznej państw członkowskich ASEAN, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 2021. Haliżak E. (1999), Stosunki międzynarodowe w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa. Gawlikowski K. (red.) (2004), Azja Wschodnia na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Stosunki międzynarodowe i gospodarcze, Wydawnictwo Trio, Warszawa. Nawrot K.A. (2021), Współpraca i integracja gospodarcza Azji Wschodniej. Studium teoretyczno-empiryczne, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa. Other materials provided by the instructors Courses |