Paper writing: from the original idea to the final submission 1600-SZD-SPEC-PAN-ZJ

Knowledge | The graduate knows and understands:
WG_01 - to the extent necessary for existing paradigms to be revised - a worldwide body of work, covering theoretical foundations as well as general and selected specific issues - relevant to a particular discipline
within the social sciences
WG_02 - the main development trends in the disciplines of the social sciences in which the education is provided
WG_03 - scientific research methodology in the field of the social sciences
WK_01 - fundamental dilemmas of modern civilisation from the perspective of the social sciences
Skills | The graduate is able to:
UK_05 - speaking a foreign language at B2 level of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages using the professional terminology specific to the discipline within the social sciences, to the extent enabling participation in an international scientific and professional environment
Social competences | The graduate is ready to
KO_01 - fulfilling the social obligations of researchers and creators
KO_02 - fulfilling social obligations and taking actions in the public interest, in particular in initiating actions in the public interest
KO_03 - think and acting in an entrepreneurial manner

Principles for passing the classes and the subject (including resit session): completion of in-class and at home activities
Methods for the verification of learning outcomes: Activities performed as a part of the course
Evaluation criteria: Acquisition of knowledge sufficient for submiting an article

-

1. Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567, 305-307. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9;
2. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-4711-aac4716-4718. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716;
3. Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (2007). Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 817-835.;
4. Habib Bajwa, N. U., König, C. J., & Harrison, O. S. V. (2016). Toward Evidence-Based Writing Advice: Using Applied Linguistics to Understand Reviewers' Expectations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(3), 419-434. doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0002;
5. Hensel, P. G. (2020). Systematyczny przegląd literatury w naukach o zarządzaniu i jakości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania UW;
6. Hensel, P. G. (2021). Dissecting the Tension of Open Science Standards Implementation in Management and Organization Journals. Accountability in Research. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1981870;
7. Hensel, P. G. (2022). Organization and Management Scholars’ Technological Conservatism: Could we free ourselves from the shackles of paper-bound logic? Strategic Organization. doi:10.1177/14761270211067162;
8. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins;
9. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol 70 (Vol. 70, pp. 747-770). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews;
10. Starbuck, W. H. (2006). The Production of Knowledge. The Challenges of Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
11. Sterling, T. D. (1959). Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54(285), 30-34. doi:10.1080/01621459.1959.10501497;
12. Tourish, D. (2020). The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1), 99-109.

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of 1600-SZD-SPEC-PAN-ZJ in USOSweb