Qualitative research methods 1600-SZD-N-MBJ-BPA
- https://classroom.google.com/w/MTk0MjYwOTY3ODla/t/all
- https://classroom.google.com/c/NjM4MDY4NTQ3NzQ1 (term 2023L)
The subject encompasses a discussion of overarching themes in qualitative research methodology, including the types and currents of qualitative research (non-quantitative "q" research and "Q" research (anti-positivist and interpretive)); disparities in research conceptualization between quantitative and qualitative inquiries; the selection of research subjects in qualitative studies; variations in case studies and qualitative comparative research; considerations of representativeness and saturation; and ethical standards in qualitative research. Additionally, doctoral candidates will gain a comprehensive understanding of the following research methods: the grounded theory method and its evolution; thematic analysis and qualitative content analysis, encompassing inductive and deductive coding techniques in practice; critical discourse analysis; and observational and participatory methods. Doctoral candidates will also acquire the skills needed to craft a scholarly article based on empirical qualitative research.
General topics coverage:
1. Revision. Types and Trends in Qualitative Research (Q Studies (Non-quantitative) and Q Studies (Antipositivist and Interpretive); Contrasts in Research Approaches between Quantitative and Qualitative Inquiries). Selection of Research Subjects in Qualitative Studies, Representativeness, Saturation, Ethical Standards in Qualitative Research
Warm-up Movie: Saunder’s research onion (developed by Saunders et al in 2007.)
Discussion of a note prepared by the teacher
Readings (work in group/discussion on texts):
• Emmons, Cassandra and Andrew Moravcsik, “Graduate Qualitative Methods Training in Political Science: A Disciplinary Crisis,” PS: Political Science & Politics 53/2 (April 2020): 258-264.
• Mahoney, James, “After KKV. The New Methodology of Qualitative Research,” World Politics 62/1 (2010): 120-147.
• Wood, Elisabeth Jean, “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones,” Qualitative Sociology 29/3 (2006): 373-86.
• Hoover Green, Amelia, and Dara Kay Cohen, “Centering Human Subjects: The Ethics of ‘Desk Research’ on Political Violence,” Journal of Global Security Studies 6/2 (2021).
• Darnton, Christopher, “The Provenance Problem: Research Methods and Ethics in the Age of WikiLeaks,” American Political Science Review 116/3 (2022): 1110–1125.
Suggested readings:
• Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook – Third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Silverman, D. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
• W. Lawrence Newman, Basics of Social Research: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Pearson New International Edition 2014.
• Earl Babbie, The Basics of Social Research. Wadsworth 2011.
• John W. Creswell, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage 2014.
In-class/Home assignment:
Prepare a note/mind map on the topic of Qualitative Content Analysis:
1) Inductive Coding Techniques in Practice
2) Deductive Coding Techniques in Practice
Readings:
• The Practical Guide to Qualitative Content Analysis,
• Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative coding,
2. Critical Discourse Analysis
Warm-up Movie: Norman Fairclough's Three Dimensional Model of CDA
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Jacobs, K. (2019). Discourse analysis, In: Walters, M. (ed), Social Research Methods, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 316-340.
• Jacobs, K. (2021). Discourse Analysis. In: Baum, S. (eds) Methods in Urban Analysis. Cities Research Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_9
• Yaser Khajavi and Alireza Rasti (2020) A discourse analytic investigation into politicians’ use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches, Cogent Arts & Humanities 7(1), 1-15, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051
3. Critical Discourse Analysis
Warm-up Movie: Bacchi's view of public policy,
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Jacobs, K. (2019). Discourse analysis, In: Walters, M. (ed), Social Research Methods, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, pp. 316-340.
• Jacobs, K. (2021). Discourse Analysis. In: Baum, S. (eds) Methods in Urban Analysis. Cities Research Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_9
• Alice Tawell & Gillean McCluskey (2022) Utilising Bacchi's what's the problem represented to be? (WPR) approach to analyse national school exclusion policy in England and Scotland: a worked example, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45:2, 137-149, DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2021.1976750
• Price, Richard, “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo,” International Organization 49/1 (1995): 73-103.
Suggested readings:
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the problem represented to be? New South Wales: Pearson Education.
• Andersen, N. (2003). Discursive Analytical Strategies. Bristol: Policy Press.
4. Thematic Analysis
Warm-up Movie: Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research,
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
• Herzog, C., Handke, C., Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22
• Botterill, L., & Lewis, N. (2023). Thematic analysis using the Schwartz values theory: Exploring the use of values appeals in persuasive speech during COVID-19 in Australia. European Political Science Review, 15(1), 136-144. doi:10.1017/S1755773922000509
Suggested readings:
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE Publications.
5. Case Studies
Warm-up Movies: Types of Case Study. Part 1 of 3 on Case Studies, Planning a Case Study. Part 2 of 3 on Case Studies,
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005) – Chapters 1, 4-5.
• Blattman, Christopher, “Children and War: How ‘Soft’ Research Can Answer the Hard Questions in Political Science,” Perspectives on Politics 10/2 (2012): 403-413.
• Bakke, Kristin, “Copying and Learning from Outsiders? Assessing Diffusion from Transnational Insurgents in the Chechen Wars,” in Jeffrey T. Checkel, Editor, Transnational Dynamics of Civil War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013) - Chapter 2
Suggested readings:
• Gerring, John, Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Second Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017) – Chapters 1-3, 5, 7-8, 11.
6. Observational and Participatory Methods
Warm-up Movies: 2.2 Participant Observation | Qualitative Methods, Participatory Action Research
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Philip Balsiger and Alexandre Lambelet, (2014) 7 Participant Observation [In:] Donatella della Porta (ed.) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, Oxford University Press.
• Gillespie, A., & Michelson, M. R. (2011). Participant Observation and the Political Scientist: Possibilities, Priorities, and Practicalities. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(2), 261–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319906
• Kiran Cunningham and Lillian Muyomba-Tamale (2022), 30 Action Research. In: Selen A. Ercan (ed.) et al., Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy, Oxford University Press.
Suggested readings:
• Alice McIntyre, Participatory Action Research (2008, SAGE Publications).
7. Qualitative Comparative Research
Warm-up Movies: Comparative Historical Analysis by Marcus Kreuzer, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Principles and Application
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Mahoney, James and Kathleen Thelen, Editors, Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) – Chapters 1, 6, 8, 9.
• Gibson, Christopher, Movement-driven Development: The Politics of Health and Democracy in Brazil (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019) – Chapters 1, 4.
• Toshkov, D., Research Design in Political Science, (Palgrave, 2016) – Chapter 9. QCA
8. Grounded Theory Method and Its Evolution
Warm-up Movie: Grounded theory,
Readings (work in group/discussion on students’ notes/mind maps based on the texts):
• Kathy Charmaz (2019) Grounded Theory. In: lan Bryman, Tim Liao, Michael Lewis-Beck (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods, SAGE Publications.
• Brittney Becker, Götz Kaufmann (Ed.) (2012), The Grounded Theory Method and its uses for political science, Series of Papers: Methods of Field Research. https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/19260/Becker_GTM_Political_Science.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Dylan J. Swift, A GROUNDED THEORY APPROACH TO ANALYZING POLITICAL NARRATIVES, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/216048876.pdf
Suggested readings:
• Antony Bryant, Kathy Charmaz (2019), The SAGE Handbook Of Current Developments In Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications.
• Antony Bryant, Kathy Charmaz (2007), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications.
• Kapiszewski, Diana, Lauren MacLean and Benjamin Read, Field Research in Political Science: Practices and Principles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) – Chapters 1, 3, 4, 7.
• Geertz, Clifford, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in The Interpretation of Cultures (NY: Basic Books, 1973) – Chapter 1.
• Schatz, Edward, “Introduction: Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics,” in Edward Schatz, Editor, Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009) – Introduction.
• Gusterson, Hugh, “Ethnographic Research,” in Audie Klotz and Deepa Prakash, Editors, Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide (NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008) – Chapter 7.
• Wood, Elisabeth Jean, “Ethnographic Research in the Shadow of Civil War,” in Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003) – Chapter 2.
• Fujii, Lee Ann, “Five Stories of Accidental Ethnography: Turning Unplanned Moments in the Field into Data,” Qualitative Research 15/4 (2015): 525–39.
FINAL ASSIGNMENT:
• Prepare a scientific paper (a review article) of approximately 3000 words, in which you critically discuss a selected qualitative research method covered during the course. Spelling can be US or UK English so long as usage is consistent.
Writing a Research Paper
Six Simple Steps for Writing a Research Paper Paper
How to Write a Research Paper | A Beginner's Guide
A general guide on how to conduct and write a literature review
Term 2023L:
The subject encompasses a discussion of overarching themes in qualitative research methodology, including the types and currents of qualitative research (non-quantitative "q" research and "Q" research (anti-positivist and interpretive)); disparities in research conceptualization between quantitative and qualitative inquiries; the selection of research subjects in qualitative studies; variations in case studies and qualitative comparative research; considerations of representativeness and saturation; and ethical standards in qualitative research. Additionally, doctoral candidates will gain a comprehensive understanding of the following research methods: the grounded theory method and its evolution; thematic analysis and qualitative content analysis, encompassing inductive and deductive coding techniques in practice; critical discourse analysis; and observational and participatory methods. Doctoral candidates will also acquire the skills needed to craft a scholarly article based on empirical qualitative research. General topics coverage: In-class/Home assignment: 2. Critical Discourse Analysis 3. Critical Discourse Analysis 4. Thematic Analysis 5. Case Studies 6. Observational and Participatory Methods 7. Qualitative Comparative Research 8. Grounded Theory Method and Its Evolution FINAL ASSIGNMENT: |
Term 2024L:
General topics coverage: In-class/Home assignment: 2. Critical Discourse Analysis 3. Critical Discourse Analysis 4. Thematic Analysis 5. Case Studies 6. Observational and Participatory Methods 7. Qualitative Comparative Research 8. Grounded Theory Method and Its Evolution FINAL ASSIGNMENT: |
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Mode
Learning outcomes
Knowledge: Knows and understands:
WG_3 - methodology of scientific research
Skills: Can:
UW_1 - use knowledge of various scientific or artistic disciplines to creatively identify, formulate and innovatively solve complex problems or perform research tasks, and specifically: define the purpose and subject of research and formulate a research hypothesis, develop and creatively use research methods, techniques and tools, draw conclusions from research results
UO_1 – plan and carry out individual and team research or creative projects, also in an international environment
Social competences: Is ready to:
KK_3 – recognise the importance of science in solving cognitive and practical problems
Assessment criteria
• active participation in classes
• written assessment
One absence is admissible.
Practical placement
Not applicable
Bibliography
The literature will be made available to the students during the classes.
Notes
Term 2023L:
Not applicable |
Term 2024L:
Not applicable |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: