Interdisciplinary conference 1600-SZD-KI
The Interdisciplinary Conference (doctoral students’ meeting) is oriented towards both content related objectives and the creation of an integration space for the doctoral students from the different disciplines represented in the School. It is held in the form of a seminar lasting two full days. During the seminar, the doctoral students have an opportunity to present their own research projects and discuss them with other doctoral students and researchers. In order to allow enough time for the presentations and discussions, the work is organised into several simultaneous seminar sections (by analogy with the organisation of a considerable number of scientific conferences).
Type of course
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
● UW_1
The doctoral student can use knowledge of various scientific or artistic disciplines to creatively identify, formulate and innovatively solve complex problems or perform research tasks, and specifically:
- define the purpose and subject of research and formulate a research hypothesis,
- develop and creatively use research methods, techniques and tools,
- draw conclusions from research results.
● UW_2
The doctoral student can make a critical analysis and evaluation of the results of scientific research, expert activity and other creative works and their contribution to the development of knowledge.
● UK_1
The doctoral student can communicate on specialist topics to a degree enabling active participation in the international research community.
● UK_3
The doctoral student can initiate a debate.
● UK_4
The doctoral student can participate in the scientific discourse.
● UU_1
The doctoral student can independently plan and act for their own development as well as inspire and organise the development of other people.
● UU_2
The doctoral student can plan activities or groups of activities and implement them using modern methods and tools.
● KK_1
The doctoral student is ready to critically evaluate the achievements of a given scientific discipline.
● KK_2
The doctoral student is ready to critically evaluate own contribution to the development of a given scientific discipline.
Assessment criteria
Rules for passing the course and the subject (including re-sits):
timely submission of the paper's title, abstract (according to the indicated criteria) and keywords; participation in the opening lecture; oral presentation of the paper and active participation in the discussion during the panel in which the student's own research is presented. In the event of failing the subject, a doctoral student may request the postponement of the date for the completion of the course to another stage of study or the designation of equivalent courses whose assumed learning outcomes are identical or similar to those of the subject and the passing of which shall be treated equally when settling the completion of a stage of study.
Methods for the verification of learning outcomes:
evaluation of the oral presentation of the paper and activity in the discussion following the presentation.
Evaluation criteria:
compliance of the paper with the accepted title and abstract, factual correctness, activity in the discussion.
Bibliography
A bibliography, on which the presentation will be based, should be added to the abstract/speech. The bibliography should be prepared based on APA7.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: