Impact evaluation methods 1600-SZD-ID-MOW
The course offers an introduction to counterfactual methods of evaluation. First, methods for identifying causal effects will be discussed. Examples of real experimental studies from various fields will illustrate the importance of random assignment to research groups. In particular, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be presented in details. In the next part of the course, regression discontinuity designs (RDD) and the difference-in-differences (DiD) method will be discussed. Students will learn how to identify the conditions for applying these methods and how to interpret the obtained results. The practical application of these techniques in evaluation research will be presented through numerous examples, allowing participants to better understand their practical significance and potential limitations. A brief introduction to other evaluation techniques, such as the instrumental variables method, propensity score matching, and the synthetic control method, will enable an understanding of the wide spectrum of available research tools. At the end of the course, participants will have the opportunity to analyze real case studies. The course will provide doctoral students with not only theoretical knowledge but also the practical skills necessary for conducting evaluation research independently, preparing them to effectively apply these methods in their future studies.
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
Knowledge | The graduate knows and understands:
WG_02 - the main development trends in the disciplines of the social sciences in which the education is provided
Skills | The graduate is able to:
UW_01 – make use of knowledge from various fields of science, in particular the social sciences in order to creatively identify, formulate and innovatively solve complex problems or perform tasks of a research nature, and in particular to: define the purpose and object of scientific research in the field of the social sciences, formulate a research hypothesis; develop research methods, techniques and tools and apply them creatively; make inferences based on scientific findings
UK_04 - participating in scientific discourse in the field of the social sciences
Social competences | The graduate is ready to
KK_01 - critically evaluating achievements within a given scientific discipline in the field of the social sciences
Assessment criteria
Description of requirements related to participation in classes, including the
permitted number of explained absences: The course completion requirement is the creation and defense of an evaluation project using counterfactual methods.
Principles for passing the classes and the subject (including resit session): 80% attendance is required, along with the creation of a research project and its presentation in class.
Methods for the verification of learning outcomes: Quizzes, participation in discussions, and the defense of your own research project.
Evaluation criteria: The student should demonstrate an understanding of the differences in counterfactual methods and be able to argue the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
Practical placement
-
Bibliography
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank Publications
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: