Polish-Ukrainian literary relations 3222-50SLPU3K-N
The scope and methods of research into Polish-Ukrainian literary relations will be discussed. During the course, we will analyze the Polish-Ukrainian cultural and literary borderland against the background of history from ancient times to the present day. Particular attention will be paid to the "golden period" of the development of Kievan Rus' literature and culture; also Renaissance, Baroque, Neo-Romanticism, Vitahism (the literature of Rozstrzelanego reborn), contemporary Polish-Ukrainian literary relations.
- Polish-Ukrainian literary relations. Methodological problems. Polish-Ukrainian cultural borderland against a historical background. Selected issues of literary relations and literary borderland in the times of Kievan Rus. Polonika in "Pow". Polish-Ukrainian borderland: dialogue between the cultures of the Baroque era. Selected issues of Polish-Ukrainian literary relations and the literary border in the 20th-21st century
The interpenetration of both cultures and the idea of Central and Eastern Europe. Contemporary cultural initiatives undertaken in the Polish-Ukrainian borderland
If it is not possible to conduct classroom classes, classes will be conducted using distance communication tools, most likely Google Meet and others recommended by the University of Warsaw.
Student workload
30 hours in the classroom - 1 ECTS
60 hours of preparation for passing - 2 ECTS
Type of course
Mode
Remote learning
Prerequisites (description)
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
The student knows and understands in depth research in the field of Polish-Ukrainian literary relations, knows the subject and methodological specificity as well as terminology (S2_W01)
The student is able to prepare oral presentations in the literary field from the earliest times to the present day on specific issues, using theoretical approaches, as well as various sources (S2_U08)
The student is able to independently plan and implement his own learning throughout his life and direct others in this area (S2_U11)
The student is ready to critically evaluate the received content (S2_K01)
The student is ready to recognize the importance of knowledge in solving cognitive and practical problems (S2_K02)
Assessment criteria
Conditions for admission to pass the course:
- systematic preparation of the assigned material for classes and participation in classes (control of the current preparation) - 50%
- completion of a term paper - 50%.
Semester work requirements:
1. The author should formulate a research problem, that is, make a thesis which he will try to verify (prove or disprove) in the work.
2. Before starting to write a thesis, its plan and the list of literature should be consulted with the teacher.
3. The paper should be 5-8 pages of standard text, ie the length should not be less than 10,000 characters with spaces and greater than 15,000 characters with spaces (including footnotes). The work should contain a list of the used bibliography (the volume of the list of the used bibliography does not, however, be included in the above-mentioned volume of the essay).
4. The structure of the work should include: introduction, development, ending, bibliography. The introduction should include: thesis (formulation of the research problem), objectives of the work, justification for the choice of topic, description of the subject and subject literature. Develop a proper analysis of the texts. The conclusion should include the conclusions resulting from the research.
5. Each page of the work must be provided with bibliographic, source or reference footnotes.
6. The text of the work should be edited in accordance with the following rules: - font: Times New Roman Normal, size 12, - foreign language phrases in italics, - line spacing: 1.5 lines, - standard margins (top, bottom, left and right: 2.5 cm), - title of the article: Times New Roman Normal font, size 14, bold.
7. Footnotes should be placed in the text as footnotes, Times New Roman Normal font, size 10, line spacing: 1 line.
A footnote is treated like a sentence, so it should start with a capital letter and end with a period. In the text, the number of the footnote should be placed without spaces after the word, before the comma. At the end of the sentence, the footnote number is placed before the full stop, ending the sentence. Notation of footnotes and bibliography in accordance with the standard of the yearbook "Polish-Ukrainian Studies".
Completion of the subject - the exam is in the form of a written test (5 closed questions and 5 open questions on reading knowledge). The evaluation criteria are presented in the form of percentage thresholds:
99-100% - 5! (very good grade with an exclamation mark)
93-98% - 5 (very good)
87-92% - 4+ (good plus)
77-86% - 4 (good)
70-76% - 3+ (satisfactory plus)
60-69% - 3 (satisfactory)
The following criteria are used for credits:
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all important aspects - 5.0 (very good)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes covering all significant aspects with a small number of errors or inaccuracies - 4.5 (good plus grade)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes, omitting some (less important) aspects - 4.0 (good)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes with the omission of some important aspects and with significant inaccuracies - 3.5 (satisfactory plus)
- achievement of the assumed learning outcomes without significant aspects or with serious inaccuracies - 3.0 (satisfactory plus)
- failure to achieve the assumed learning outcomes - 2.0 (unsatisfactory)
The conditions for the re-sit exam are the same as for the credit test for the main term.
The form of crediting the classes in which the student was absent is determined by the lecturer.
Exceeding justified and unjustified absences for 50% of classes may be the basis for failing the course.
Bibliography
Kasperski E., Komparatystyka a polsko-ukraińskie stosunki literackie. Problemy metodologiczne [w :] Edward Kasperski, Metody i metodologia (metodologia ogólna, nauki humanistyczne, wiedza o literaturze). Podręcznik akademicki. Redakcja naukowa Żaneta Nalewajk, Zakład graficzny Uniwersytetu Waszawskiego, Warszawa 2017, s.245-273.
F.Sielicki, Najdawniejsze polsko-ukraińskie stosunki kulturalne w świetle „Latopisu Kijowskiego” i „Kroniki Kadłubka” [w:]Z dziejów stosunków literackich polsko-ukraińskich, pod red.S.Kozaka i M.Jakóbca,Wrocław 1974, s.37-70.
R.Łuzny, Dawne piśmiennictwo ukraińskie a polskie tradycje literackie [w:]Z dziejów stosunków literackich polsko-ukraińskich, pod red.S.Kozaka i M.Jakóbca,Wrocław 1974, s.7-36.
Z.Grosbart, Maksyma Rylskiego droga do arcyprzekładu „Pana Tadeusza”[w:]Z dziejów stosunków literackich polsko-ukraińskich, pod red.S.Kozaka i M.Jakóbca,Wrocław 1974, s.239-270.
Antologia poezji ukraińskiej, Ludowa Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza, Warszawa 1976, 1064 ss.
Kasperski E., Metody i metodologia (metodologia ogólna, nauki humanistyczne, wiedza o literaturze). Podręcznik akademicki. Red.naukowa Żaneta Nalewajk, Warszawa 2017, 480 ss.
Nycz R.,, Nowa humanistyka w Polsce: kilka bardzo subiektywnych obserwacji, koniektur, refutacji [w:] Teksty drugie, 2017, nr 1, s.18-40.
Pamięć zbiorowa i kulturowa, pod red. M. Saryusz-Wolskiej, Kraków 2009.
Kasperski E.,, Swojskie, cudze, uniwersalne. Paralele polsko-ukraińskie [w:] Warszawskie Zeszyty Ukrainoznawcze t. 21-22 r. 2007, s. 21-31.
Kozak S.,, Polacy i Ukraińcy. W kręgu myśli i kultury pogranicza. Epoka romantyzmu, Warszawa 2005.
Sielicki F., Polonika w „Powieści minionych lat” [w:]Powieść minionych lat. Przełożył i opracował Franciszek Sielicki. Zakład Narodowy im.Ossolińskich, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1999, s.XL-LXII.
Chruślińska I., Wiele twarzy Ukrainy. Rozmowy Izy Chruślińskiej i Piotra Tymy, Lublin 2005, 356 s.
Makowski S., Krzemieniec - Ateny Juliusza Słowackiego, Warszawa 2004.
Sevcenko I., Ukraina między Wschodem a Zachodem, Warszawa 1996.
Sosnowska D., Inna Galicja, Warszawa 2008.
Stegner (red), Polska-Ukraina. Spotkanie kultur, Ostaszewo Gdańskie 1997.
Stegner (red), Wschód-Zachód-Ukraina, Ostaszewo Gdańskie 1999.
Uliasz S., Obrazy Ukrainy i Ukraińców w literaturze polskiej [w:] O literaturze kresów pogranicza kultur, Rzeszów 2001.
Walas T. (red.), Narody i stereotypy, Kraków 1995.
Dylematy wielokulturowości, pod red. W. Kalaga, Kraków 2007.
A.Kamińska, Wiersze z Ukrainy i dla Ukrainy. Antologia, Bydgoszcz 2014, 120 ss.
Ukraińska nadzieja/Українська надія.Fundacja „Nasz wybór”, Wydawnictwo Forma, Warszawa, Szczecin, Bezrzerze 2017, 199 ss.
Обірваний вірш. Зузанна Гінчанка (1917-1944). Републікація фрагменту з книги: Ізольда Кєц, Зузанна Гінчанка: життя та творчість, Познань 1994, с.147-164. Zuzanna Ginczanka, Wiersze wybrane, „Czyteknik”, Warszawa 1953, 112 ss.
Р.Радишевський, Українсько-польське пограниччя: сарматизм, бароко, діалог культур (Київські полоністичні студії), Київ 2009, 299 сс.
І.Кропивко, Українська і польська постмодерна проза (карнавал, фрагментація, фронтир), Київ 2019.
Słowniki
Słownik rodzajów gatunków literackich. Pod red. Grzegorza Gazdy i Słomini Tyneckiej-Makowskiej, Universitas, Kraków 2006
Słownik terminów literackich. Pod red. Jana Sławińskiego, Wrocław-Warszawa- Kraków 1976.
Лексикон загального та порівняльного літературознавства, Чернівці 2001.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: